• Print
  • Send to a friend
  • Comment (23)

When Big Brother is the evil stepmother

Dara Squires
Published on July 20, 2011
Published on July 19, 2011
Dara Squires  RSS Feed
Topics :
Ministry of Children and Family Development , Ministry of Children and Family Development.Four , British Columbia

Derek Hoare has already lived through any parent’s nightmare. On July 12, he anxiously waited in his home for over three hours as police grid-searched his neighbourhood. Search and rescue helicopters buzzed overhead looking for his missing daughter.

He had looked away for just a moment as nine-year-old Ayn played in their backyard surrounded by a six-foot-high privacy fence.

A moment was all it took for the girl to climb up her treehouse and jump over the fence.

He frantically searched up and down his street before calling the police. Why did he call so quickly? It’s not like Ayn is a toddler, unaware of the dangers outside her fence.

In essence, though, she is. Ayn has severe autism disorder. Derek compares her naiveté to that of a three-year-old. Though she is verbal, Ayn is non-communicative, unable to hold actual conversations with others. Though she has aggressive tantrums at school and in other locations outside the home, Derek and her two older brothers, one of whom also has autism, find her to be pleasant, loveable and cheerful at home.

Her bond with her father is a close one. He has always been her primary caregiver. Despite the fact that she has two teaching assistants assigned to her at the public school she attends, he is the one that the school calls whenever she gets “out of hand.”

Once she was safely found just a couple of houses down, it was his embrace she wanted most.

Picture the tearful father holding his cherubic blond-haired little imp in his arms: a beautiful ending to a story that could have ended in tragedy.

Except, unfortunately, that wasn’t the end. Into every lovely fairytale an ugly stepmother must fall. In this case, the stepmother — as controlling and demanding as any you’ll read in the Brothers Grimm — was British Columbia’s Ministry of Children and Family Development.

Four days after Ayn’s heart-rending disappearance and return, two social workers knocked on Derek’s door. I suppose they could’ve walked right in. You see Derek’s door locks with a key from the inside, as do all the windows, in order to keep his children safe.

Ayn had escaped before, once by wriggling through a bathroom window that had been left open after her mother — still living with them at the time — had a shower. Derek learned from that lesson and adjusted the latch so that the window could open only a fraction. When his son with autism figured out how to use kitchen utensils to spring the lock on the other windows, Derek replaced all those as well.

Like any parent, Derek learns as he goes along. The stakes are a bit higher for him, of course, but his dedication to keeping his children safe is also higher as a result. Although Ayn and her older brother Lyric are naïve, they are not unintelligent. They are constantly gaining new skills — like Ayn’s trick of jumping over the fence — that he has to learn from as well.

Apparently, though, this latest escapade was about to teach him a lesson that no loving, dedicated parent should have to learn: when it comes to our children, our rights can be completely neglected on the whim of bureaucracy.

The two social workers informed Derek that they believed he had too much to handle as a single dad.

Three children, two with severe autism, is too much for any man to handle on his own. Therefore they proposed to help him by taking one child away.

Sounds just like one of those medieval fairytales now, doesn’t it? Rumpelsiltskin, perhaps?

Instead of offering respite care, more funding for therapies, a home safety study, or anything of that nature, the Ministry of Children and Family Development instead proposed to take his daughter.

Derek, of course, said no.

So they went to Ayn’s school and seized her.

Bad enough, but surely Derek, having done nothing wrong, would be able to get his daughter back relatively unscathed. Apparently not.

Despite the fact that their own studies showed Ayn was suffering from neither neglect nor abuse but was a well-cared-for girl, the ministry kept her. And they did worse than just keep her from her father.

They put her into a psychiatric hospital and reportedly on drugs.

It appears the Ministry of Children and Family Development, who thought they could do a better job handling Ayn then her own father could, couldn’t handle the girl’s tantrums.

Derek hasn’t seen his daughter since.

After 18 days during which she cried for her father non-stop, ministry workers requested that he give them a photo of himself to comfort her. She is currently in a foster home, still on medications, still confused and lost and wanting her daddy.

The Ministry of Children and Family Development says they won’t give her back until she undergoes a six-week psychiatric assessment program. Derek says he hasn’t been given the chance to see his daughter.

And if he does, he says, he will not use that right.

For he believes Ayn, living in this crazy fairytale story, is waiting for him to rescue her. Imagine the princess’ horror if the prince showed up to combat the dragon and bring her home but instead wound up walking away leaving her in the gaping maw of the horrid beast. That is how Ayn would feel if her father visited her and wasn’t able to bring her home, Derek feels.

There is a court date scheduled for September in which he will be able to present his case for having Ayn come home. Of course, at any time the Ministry of Children and Family Development could choose to release her, but Derek and his supporters doubt that will happen now.

Until the presentation hearing, he can only work to make Ayn’s grim fairytale a story that is told to as many people as possible.

 If you’d like to read more of her story, join the Facebook group “Help bring little Autistic girl back to her daddy” or read the petition to “Bring Ayn Van Dyk Home” on thepetitionsite.com.

In the meanwhile, hold your children close and whatever you do, don’t take your eyes of them for a moment. If you do, their evil stepmother may send them to find a candy house in the woods.

Comments

  • Username
    Marion
    - January 3, 2012 at 16:08:57

    It's been 6 months and Derek still does not have his daughter home nor does he have any answers as to why she was taken. Is this an agengy that works in the "best interest of the child?" I think not and neither do over 4500 followers who have been supporing Derek, This is a tragedy that should have never happen. She should NOT of been taken. They did not even conduct an investigation. They could have offered him respite, or someother type of services. Yes there are two sides of the story BUT MCFD seem to be keeping theirs a secret. They said he was overwhelmed....well that is no reason to remove your child from a loving home. Imagine someone going into a social workers home and removing their child because she was far too overwhelmed and stressed working on a case like Derek's......LET HER GO HOME...THAT'S WHERE SHE BELONGS NOT IN FOSTER CARE.....IF MCFD FEELS HE IS OVERWHELMED THEN OFFER SERVICES TO ASSIST HIM. IT WILL BE LESS COSTLY THAN HER BEING IN CARE!!!!

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Robert Hutchins
    - September 6, 2011 at 23:57:43

    I sent an e-mail to: Prime Minister Stephen Harper Office of the Prime Minister 80 Wellington Street Ottawa, ON K1A 0A2 Canada Fax: (613) 941-6900 E-mail: pm@pm.gc.ca Premier Christy Clark Premier of British Columbia Parliament Buildings Victoria, BC, V8V 1X4 Canada Fax: (250) 387-0087 E-mail: Christy@christyclark.ca and Mary McNeil Minister of Children and Family Development Room 306 Parliament Buildings Victoria, BC V8V 1X4 Canada Fax: (250) 387-9722 E-mail: mary.mcneil.mla@leg.bc.ca

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Jacinta
    - August 24, 2011 at 15:51:25

    The MCFD is out of control, I know this first hand, All my life they have been there judging my mother and questioning her as a parent because she has high functioning Autism. She was and still is a wonderful parent, she Cares so much for me and has a beautiful soul. But because of her "disability" The ministry had attempted to take me away several times during my childhood, Luckily a close friend of my mothers (who was a teacher) agreed to restbite. But even now with me at the age of 17, The ministry still is trying to control my life as well as my mothers. I agree with Linda Plourde's statment: "The social worker system, as it applies to children, is out of control"

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    PP
    - August 5, 2011 at 18:54:07

    First of all, there are always 2 sides to a story.. so people don't ever get the full picture .. but with that said being a mother of an autistic boy with violent outburst. i can say if you put a bunch of these so called professionals in a room with a bunch of autistic children and their parents ( im thinking like a christmas party or something ) and see how sometimes these situations can cause these children to have a melt down and to see sometimes how a parent as to respond ...we has parents may all lose our children.. people only see what they see .. and when u don't know the whole story things can get complicated ... thats why we have to spread more awareness on autism and how it effects e 1 around us .. its very tiring at times being a single parent of an autistic child and i hope that ayn is reunited with her dad soon .. with 2 autistic children that man deserves a medal ..

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    newsreader
    - July 27, 2011 at 12:28:29

    Again, in response to Anon: I'm not certain I agree with what you say about the comments provided by the columnist being 'dangerous and irresponsible.' This is opinion, not news or investigative reporting. Whether we agree or not, the columnist is free to express opinions while being under no obligation to present 'all the facts.' Columnists enjoy that particular freedom to explore issues -- even if this means being provocative and controversial. Your cautions against danger and irresponsibility sound more like an attempt to stifle discussion, and you seem to feel that the issue at hand is not for public consumption. If questionable practices on the part of governments went undiscussed and undisclosed because of such action being seen as 'dangerous' and 'irresponsible,' we'd never hear of government wrongdoing or injustice. I'd like for both sides of this issue to come out, and I look forward to clarification on the part of the MCFD. Discussion of this issue had to begin somehow, and it wasn't going to start with them. Any government agency with the power to step in and take children away from their parents is in no position to operate in secrecy. I strongly suspect that, in this case at any rate, the MCFD is beginning to obfuscate confidentiality and secrecy -- and I perceive a possible need for review of the sort of climate in which the MCFD investigates and acts on cases of children at risk. There's at least the suggestion that their power to seize a child has gone too far. They don't have the authority to demand of parents that they medicate their children, either -- and that might be something that needs to be looked at as well.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Anon
    - July 27, 2011 at 09:16:04

    Nope - don't work for them. But I know first hand that a life was saved because of them and only hope that it isn't too late. I also know first hand the lies that the mother of this child and some relatives will tell to anyone who will listen about how her child was "stolen" from her. I also know a person who ran an inhome daycare and had social services called on them by a vindictive neighbour. After a thorough investigation - which i had to participate in - she was cleared with apologies. She holds absolutely no resentment towards these people who were only doing their jobs. I also didn't say that what they did was necessarily right and shouldn't be questioned. I'm saying that there is almost always more than meets the eye in cases like this and that taking someone at complete face value when you only know one side of what I am sure is a very complicated story, is dangerous and irresponsible.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    newsreader
    - July 25, 2011 at 09:55:08

    In response to Anon's comments, I see the facts presented in this column as an excellent first step in bringing all the facts out. That process has to begin somewhere since, as you say, the system is not perfect, and it looks like the Ministry of Children and Family Development may have overstepped itself. What you see as irresponsible I see as necessary. Confidentiality is necessary as well, of course, but it should not act as a shield for people in authority to abuse their power or make harmful mistakes. If the Ministry has a story to tell and facts to present, I hope they will disclose accordingly. The mounting controversy around this case would make such disclosure very wise because I think they have some explaining to do. We mustn't forget that governments at all levels are accountable to the public.

    Submit a Comment

    • Username
      Rothwell
      - July 27, 2011 at 08:04:36

      Anon's comments below are so typical of the kind of comments that often surface when outrageous apprehensions occur for which there is no explanation. It's always claimed that the poor social workers and MCFD are stymied because they are subject to privacy laws, and its often insinuated that if only the public knew what an abusive, selfish, drunk loser the parent was, well, we'd just all be soooooo thank ful for MCFD. But what MCFD really dislikes, more than anything, is publicity about their abuses of power, and taking a little girl away from her dad like this is about as abusive as it gets. By the way, Anon, you wouldn't happen to work for MCFD, would you?

  • Username
    Anon
    - July 23, 2011 at 11:38:01

    Let me tell you a story. A slightly mentally delayed woman had her 8 year old daughter suddenly removed from her care. The woman and her family cried that there was no reason for it. The child was well cared for! The mother was on social assistance and did her best with limited resources. Unfortunately, social services could not tell their side of the story. The woman said she was reported to social services by a neighbour who witnessed her yell at her child in the park because the little girl refused to leave. In fact, there were numerous calls to social services. The child was subject to abuse by her "loving" stepfather. Also, "doing her best" apparently meant forgoing new shoes for the child and buying a television so the girl could watch Sesame Street. In this case, as with many, confidentiality prevents social services from telling their side of the story. One thing that's odd about the story is that it stated the child cried for her father....severely autistic child are very often non-verbal. It said she was medicated upon removal from the home. Is it possible that numeroous requests to use medication therapy were ignored? While the system is not perfect, publishing only one side of the story when you do not, and cannot have all of the facts is irresponsible.

    Submit a Comment

    • Username
      Crystal
      - July 28, 2011 at 19:47:28

      Anon, you must work for CPS, my son is severly autistic and considered "non verbal", he has very limited speach....He can say "mommy" he is 14 yrs old and mommy was his first word when he was 8!! Just because they are classed as "non verbal" doesn't mean they have no speech, it means it is limited and often not used properly. Excuse me there are MANY families out their who refuse to medicate their children! Why ruin their bodies because you cannot keep up, sorry there are other options to consider....such as behavioural therapy..MCFD has severly harmed this child, she will have a very hard time trusting anyone ever again....she will forever be changed....these children never forget. My son was traumatised 10 years ago when his father died, he has never forgoten, we still have problems today. With alot of work behind us and alot to go my son will heal, the longer Ayn is away from her father the harder the family will have to work, she will turn back into her shell and they will have to start from the begginning.

  • Username
    Linda Plourde
    - July 21, 2011 at 10:43:34

    Our Children are in danger, and unless we act now it is a clear cut devastation. The social worker system, as it applies to children, is out of control, seriously out of control, and nobody’s doing anything about it. “They violate all kinds of privacy and rights,” Vigilance and responsibility are the only safeguards of our families, of our liberties. Never have these duties been more urgent for us as citizens than today, with child-stealing agendas running rampant. The artillery that scares them most is not parents' fury, but our simple confidence and faith. Not lawsuits alone, but most of all, an informed citizenry. Not lone advocates groups, but ordinary parents and patriots - working together. And most of all, they fear the truth. So tell it. We must tell it. We must find a worthy ear to share with. We must tell it straight. This is worth the cost. End the cover-up, and the secrecy. Hear the children’s cry. Lets speak out for the children-let stop the inhumane cruelty. Canadian need to sit up and pay attention.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    sherilyn
    - July 20, 2011 at 16:55:37

    Thank you for covering this story. It is appalling. The government's inability and/or unwillingness to intervene in this case is shocking. Freedom for Ayn!

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    lonewolf
    - July 20, 2011 at 15:45:03

    We are living in a totalatarian society, no longer a free country. The Government of all people can't look after children. The constant complaints of child abuse while in the hands of Government and foster care are totally rediculous. This is people who have a job with child care doing things like this to show they are doing something to justify their job.What is going on in our Country today is no better then what went on in Germany during the Hitler regime. We need to take back our country and get back our rights. If it is every brought to light the injustice that is being done, the people who did it will not be punished but should be jailed for the rest of their lives. Mount Cashel was one way the Government handled the child care issue and look how that turned out.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Dana K
    - July 20, 2011 at 15:44:58

    This makes me sick to my stomach. Why was respite care not an option? Why us the "fix" to kidnap a child???

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Michelle in NL
    - July 20, 2011 at 15:21:36

    Thanks so much for sharing this incredibly HORRIBLE story with us. I have a nephew with autism, and I can't imagine anything more devastating to his development than to take him away from his family, we would all surely die from heartbreak! I hope & pray every decent human being & parent out there will JOIN this man in his fight to get his daughter back, and I hope they fire/put in jail the idiots that allowed this to happen in the first place!!

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Heather
    - July 20, 2011 at 15:21:31

    I feel sick after reading this Dara, this is utterly disgraceful. That poor child, and her poor family. I hope they get reunited for good very soon. thanks for bringing it to our attention

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Livi
    - July 20, 2011 at 15:21:28

    Oh my god, that's horrific. Truly horrific. Do they not realise, or care, the damage they are doing to that poor little girl? I so hope that he gets her back soon and that he takes those who took her away to court for some form of abuse, because surely they deserve to pay for causing such distress to her and him?

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    susie
    - July 20, 2011 at 15:20:25

    How completely horrible. What is wrong with this world?

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Liveotherwise
    - July 20, 2011 at 15:20:17

    This happened very recently in the uk with an adult being removed from his primary carer. There was a huge public campaign to get him returned to his father, which was eventually successful. Here's hoping something similar can be achieved.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Louise in Scotland
    - July 20, 2011 at 15:19:38

    This truly disgusting! How can they justify this!? This is one of the most shocking things I've read in a long time. How can they state they're looking after the childs best interests? The girl NEEDS her FATHER... she doesn't need THEM. This poor child could have been abandoned by her parents unable to love/care for her, but she hasn't. She is LUCKY to have a Father that loves and cares for her, and is doing the damn best he can to keep her safe despite how difficult he must find it. All parents learn on the way - and this man is doing the best he can. Where was the support? Where was offers of respite? Education? Did they give or offer ANY of those before basically KIDNAPPING a child who is so obviously loved and cared for by her Father? I just dread to think of what that poor child must be going through. You write well about how it could seem to her - in that situation. It is just like a horrifying wicked step-mother story - without the happy ending. She needs saved. Give her back to her Daddy... let her be loved.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    VB in Catalunya
    - July 20, 2011 at 10:42:47

    I can't believe this sort of thing is still happening. This is absolutely disgusting, I hope that Ayn is returned home as soon as possible and whoever made this absurd judgement is brought to task.

    Submit a Comment

    • Username
      lew skinner
      - July 20, 2011 at 15:21:38

      not suprised at what happened-- this is just a ``make works`` program for the social wokers dept- another govt dept full of idoits or relatives!!!! of----

  • Username
    newsreader
    - July 20, 2011 at 09:39:52

    Thank-you for helping to raise awareness of this arrogant abuse of power. It really is hard to believe such a thing is happening. Children need protection, no doubt, but the power of the state seems to have come down very hard on this single dad. I hope he sues. I'm sure there are plenty of children out there in far worse circumstances than his daughter, Ayn, and the B.C. Ministry of Children and Family Development should concentrate its resources and power of seizure on those cases.

    Submit a Comment

Submit a Comment

Submit a Comment

This form is NOT used for emailing the article to a friend. Please use the "Send to a friend" link at the top of the page for that purpose.

The Western Star is not responsible for posted comments. Please be polite and confine your comments to the subject of the posted story. If you have an account, please sign on to it..

(we keep all emails private)
Agreement

We ask that users remain courteous. You may not post insulting, discriminatory or inappropriate content, which may be removed at our discretion. We are not responsible for user content and opinions. Use of this site as well as content submission & ownership are governed by our Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.

Member organizations should be non-profit in nature, and promote legal activities. Any organization found promoting illegal activities or commercial products or services will be deleted from the site.

I agree with these conditions.

Advertising




loading...

Advertising