• Print
  • Send to a friend
  • Comment (5)
  •  

Kennedy tackles Muskrat Falls critics during Board of Trade address

Natural Resources Minister Jerome Kennedy, right, chats with Corner Brook city councillor Leo Bruce prior to the minister’s address to the Greater Corner Brook Board of Trade Friday. — Star photo by Gary Kean

Natural Resources Minister Jerome Kennedy, right, chats with Corner Brook city councillor Leo Bruce prior to the minister’s address to the Greater Corner Brook Board of Trade Friday. — Star photo by Gary Kean

Gary Kean
Published on February 12, 2012
Published on February 10, 2012
Gary Kean  RSS Feed
Topics :
Greater Corner Brook Board of Trade Friday.Kennedy , Statistics Canada , Public Utilities Board , CORNER BROOK , Newfoundland and Labrador , Quebec

CORNER BROOK  “I don’t want to spend my nights wondering if I’m going to be the new Joey Smallwood.”

That was how Natural Resources Minister Jerome Kennedy summed up his approach to developing the Muskrat Falls hydroelectricity project when he made an address to the Greater Corner Brook Board of Trade Friday.

Kennedy used the speaking engagement as another opportunity to discredit the project’s critics, who disagree that Newfoundland and Labrador needs the power or that Muskrat Falls is the lowest-cost option to generate the power the province will need in the future.

The minister said neither he, Premier Kathy Dunderdale, nor anyone in government wants to proceed with a project that will prove detrimental to the province’s future, as the now-infamous Upper Churchill deal former premier Smallwood signed with Quebec was.

He took aim at critics who have said the province’s population decline and the closure of newsprint mills in Stephenville and Grand Falls-Windsor have contributed to a reduced need for energy. He noted that the most recent census by Statistics Canada indicated the province has experienced its first population growth in decades and that people are building larger homes that favour electricity as their main source of heat.

He also took a shot at David Vardy, a former deputy minister and former chairman of the province’s Public Utilities Board, for raising the spectre of the possible closure of Corner Brook Pulp and Paper as another reason why Muskrat Falls should not go ahead as government hopes it will.

Kennedy, who met with paper mill union leaders earlier in the day and said he has also conversed with mill owner Joseph Kruger about the operation’s future, said there is no evidence the Corner Brook mill is going to close any time soon. In fact, Kennedy said he felt reassured after his conversations with Kruger and the unions that there will be a long-term sustainability plan put in place for the mill.

“It’s almost as if some of these critics want Corner Brook Pulp and Paper to close down so they can say, ‘I told you Muskrat Falls is not needed,’” Kennedy told the roughly 60 people at the board of trade luncheon. “Is that cynical on my part? Where else is this coming from?”

If the mill did close, the 124 megawatts of power generated by Kruger-owned Deer Lake Power could possibly revert to the provincial power grid.

“Our goal, as a government, is not to use the 124 megawatts of power that comes from Deer Lake for any other purpose than to run the mill in Corner Brook and anyone who suggests otherwise, I think, should look at their own motivations,” Kennedy said to a round of applause.

The minister said Muskrat Falls may cost a lot of money up front and there will likely be cost overruns, but the naysayers have to keep in mind what a long-term benefit the asset will be for future generations.

“It’s a revenue-generating project that will produce revenue for many years and eventually pay for itself,” said Kennedy. “We are taking on a debt to build an asset that will produce revenue. It will pay for itself while stabilizing and then reducing rates.”

Comments

  • Username
    bruce PC again
    - February 13, 2012 at 13:30:39

    geez; what does muskrat falls have to do with city of corner brook; we pay for free lunches for 10-15 A$$ kissers from city to go to this bluff; dont they have better things to do; my tax dollars paying for hundreds of dollars worth of city payroll; lunching out on back of seniors and fixed income pensioners; i doubt leo bruce knows alot about muskrat falls; and if he did? dont he have better things to do; like check his i pad; use less paper; and help cbrook mill close;

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Scott
    - February 13, 2012 at 09:27:40

    Look like Kennedy don't know what he talking about...people are taking warm bricks to bed now...there are people going to bed hungry...and he want to put more stress on their life...Way to go PC...It seen only the NDP are concern about those people.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    dogloc
    - February 13, 2012 at 09:27:07

    The biggest downfall for N.L. with the hydro projects is the federal governments past & future & Que. The federal government should create an east-west hydro grid just as it did with the west -east oil pipe that feeds Que. .Manitoba & Ont.allowed or were forced too allow.To be fair the same should be done for the hydro grid from N.L.Coal & oil hydro could be shut down & be replaced with green clean energy...

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Charles
    - February 12, 2012 at 14:40:30

    Mr Kennedy...there people who are going to bed everynight with warm bricks...There are people going to bed just about everynight from hungry...Now you and your party wants to add more stress to there life.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    lonenewfwolf
    - February 12, 2012 at 08:06:09

    We need to step back and take a look at ALL that this deal entails. Its not just about Muskrat Falls. Its also about a line to the mainland from our isolated Island grid. The Labrador Hydro issue seems separate to me. Why would we bring Churchill Falls power to the Island? Doesn't make sense. For one thing the MHI report states there is only 80MW of wind potential / planned on the Island. That statement alone make the rest of their analysis very suspect. There are many other false/suspect assumptions in the various reports NALCOR has commissioned, and wind is one of the big missing links. EMERA have an interest in Alogonquin, a utility company who own Rattle Brook which falls under the same legislation as Star Lake. Star Lake was essentially given private water rights via Harper & Co.'s $130,000,000 payout under NAFTA. The whole story of the Abitbi expropriation is needing a fresh look seems to me. With EMERA buying further into Algonqiun in early Dec. 2010 and then soon after there were 7.5 million shares purchased in EMERA at ~$30/share (and yes that's about 1/4 billion added to their bank account). Gywnn Morgan is the head of SNC-Lavalin who have what appears to be for all intents and purposes an untendered contract on the building and maintenance for the current project ongoing in Labrador. Lavalin also wrote the scoping study for EMERA on the transmission link into the States. Morgan is advising the Clarke gov't in BC on their dealings with the water/energy deals going on out there. He is not in the news here yet, and that seems a bit strange to me. He is a major factor in what is going on with all this, and may even be the architect for the whole thing. What this all means is that there is much more going on behind the scenes with these companies, our resources and the potential privatization schemes cooked up in the boardrooms of these corporations than anyone in the media or government is willing to discuss. The background information NOT being provided by those claiming to represent the best interests of the people needs to be further questioned and revealed. When politicians start pushing fear on the people by using statements like 'we'll all be bringing warm bricks to bed and wrapping up in blankets' and refusing to discuss the plans by companies such as kruger for wind farms on the island we need to bring the conversation to a higher level. Our children deserve a better world, one not controlled by the few with little to no concern for the earth, its various inhabitants or society as a whole.

    Submit a Comment

Submit a Comment

Submit a Comment

This form is NOT used for emailing the article to a friend. Please use the "Send to a friend" link at the top of the page for that purpose.

The Western Star is not responsible for posted comments. Please be polite and confine your comments to the subject of the posted story. If you have an account, please sign on to it..

(we keep all emails private)
Agreement

We ask that users remain courteous. You may not post insulting, discriminatory or inappropriate content, which may be removed at our discretion. We are not responsible for user content and opinions. Use of this site as well as content submission & ownership are governed by our Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.

Member organizations should be non-profit in nature, and promote legal activities. Any organization found promoting illegal activities or commercial products or services will be deleted from the site.

I agree with these conditions.

Advertising




loading...

Advertising