• Print
  • Send to a friend
  • Comment (6)
  •  

Contract rejection follows steps of Quebec colleagues

Members of the Communications, Energy and Paperworkers unions are seen after picking up copies of their contract offers Wednesday sfrom Corner Brook Pulp and Paper,  will vote on their offers today and Friday. — Star photo by Gary Kean

Members of the Communications, Energy and Paperworkers unions are seen after picking up copies of their contract offers Wednesday sfrom Corner Brook Pulp and Paper, will vote on their offers today and Friday.

Gary Kean
Published on June 21, 2012
Published on June 21, 2012
Gary Kean  RSS Feed
Topics :
International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers , La Presse , CEP , CORNER BROOK , Quebec , Trois-Rivieres

CORNER BROOK Kruger may want its employees to accept a labour contract modelled after the company's main competitor, but the first union to cast votes seems to have followed the lead of their fellow members at their own employer's mill in Trois-Rivieres, Que. instead.

Local 1567 of the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, which represents nearly 40 skilled trades workers such as millwrights and machinists at Corner Brook Pulp and Paper, was the first of the mill's unions to vote on the contract offer given to them by Kruger last Friday.

Ross Edison, Local 1567's president, issued a prepared statement shortly after the vote early Wednesday evening, announcing the majority of the local's members had rejected the contract offer.

Edison said it was a difficult decision for the members, but they simply could not accept the level of concessions, nor the changes to the pension and contract language in the offer.

Local 1567 saw 25 per cent of its membership slashed with a dozen layoffs in early February. Edison said another 10 per cent of his members have left the mill for better working conditions elsewhere since then.

"This decision is neither a vote against maintaining the mill, nor does it show a lack of support to pensioners or local businesses," read Edison's statement.

"Our position is to negotiate a fair contract with the company to ensure the long-term viability and competitiveness of the mill. This will be necessary to return the mill to profitability and stem the flow of outmigration of tradesmen."

About five weeks ago, trades workers and operators at Kruger's paper mill in Trois-Rivieres rejected the company's offer to them. That contract would have seen a 10 per cent wage cut.

Last week, Kruger sent its employees at the Quebec mill a letter. According to Le Nouvelliste — La Presse's newspaper in Trois-Rivieres — the letter stated the company would not be budging on its request for them to accept concessions. The company said the Quebec mill's survival depended on acceptance of the collective agreement.

There have been no further talks at that mill since the end of May, according to the paper.

In Corner Brook, Kruger issued a letter to its workers earlier this week, urging them to accept the offers before them or the future of the mill would be jeopardized. Kruger said it also requires approval of funding relief measures for its pension plan, which the unions in Corner Brook rejected last month.

If those two steps can be made, Kruger said it must then present a sustainability plan for the future of the Corner Brook mill to its lenders.

In the letter, Kruger said concessions on wages have to be part of a new collective agreement in Corner Brook.

Edison said labour costs are only one factor and indications are that the Corner Brook mill is one of the lowest cash-per-tonne producers of newsprint in North America. The union president added that newsprint at Corner Brook Pulp and Paper is produced for half the cost at "one of Kruger's other mills in Quebec."

Committed to finding solutions

Local 1567 said it is still committed to working with the company to find solutions to the challenges facing Corner Brook Pulp and Paper.

"The larger issue facing the mill's viability is a need for an infusion of capital money in the mill, which is where the government's assistance will be most needed," said Edison. "This will undoubtedly lead to lower labour costs and increased efficiency."

Like the trades union in Trois-Rivieres, the other unions at Corner Brook Pulp and Paper are represented by the CEP. They are set to vote on their respective contract offers today and Friday, the deadline Kruger has given them to accept the offer.

Local union executive members have been tight-lipped about their contract offers before voting is done and there was no word Wednesday night how the IAMAW's rejection would impact voting by other locals.

Kruger's head office in Montreal declined to comment about the rejection of the trades union contract Wednesday night.

 

Comments

  • Username
    David
    - June 22, 2012 at 10:47:56

    Wow! "Colleagues" is it? Such a nice, professional term. "Asylum cellmates" is more accurate...or better yet, how about "them vs. us, the winner fights another day"?. And when was the last time anyone in Newofundland would even tolerate being called a "colleague' of anyone in Quebec? There really are no atheists in the foxholes.....!

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    sick of this
    - June 21, 2012 at 14:48:47

    Where are you guys from, can't be Corner Brook because it seems you don't care what happens to us, why not government help they are pumping money into the avalon all the time, it's our turn, the unions are the fault, and the comments on here only makes it worse, you should be ashamed of yourselves, I am sure each and every one of you if you had to wouyld take social assistance to survive, that's my tax dollar, GROW UP!

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    CBGirl
    - June 21, 2012 at 13:03:08

    Government assistance? For what? If the mill is not profitable, then why throw money at it? Clearly the saying 'Spend money to make money' does not apply here. Making a business of that sort technologically advanced only causes more layoffs, due to increased automation. Even their lenders see that much. If the workers want to stand their ground, thats fine, but there comes a time when a company has to end the saga of gimme gimme. Its time for that mill to stand on its own two feet and pay wages with profits, not loans ans government handouts. And whats the worst that could happen? Mill closes, its torn down. Employment for a while on tear down. City builds waste water facility on that spot. The construction of that will get some people workin, the running of the facility gets a few more people workin good, guaranteed long term jobs. Does Kruger own that land? Is there a plan in place to get talking wrt site cleanup if it closes? A plan to repay the workers for the loan they gave the company a few years ago? Is the city considering making a deal for the land? Are pensions affected if CBPP folds? How many people at the mill right now could retire tomorrow based on time served (not personal financial situation)? Instead of landing with a Grand Falls sized problem, lets get crackin on making sure a mess isnt left behind. Sad to see it go, if it does, but the Mill is hardly the largest employer in the City anymore. Sure, there would be some effect, but not on the scale if, say, the Hospital was relocated to another town.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Dave from NL
    - June 21, 2012 at 11:33:53

    Mr Edison has really outlined the utter selfishness of his members. They will not take a concession on their wages because their services are in demand elsewhere.(Unlike the majotity of their union "brothers"). Then he has the gall to suggest that the Govt. use our tax dollers to upgrade the mill and ,in effect, subsifize their generous wages. NO WAY!!!!!!

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Roddy
    - June 21, 2012 at 08:40:31

    Government Assistance? NO!!!! These workers voted not to take a wage cut to keep the mill going, and then turn around in the same breath and expect the people of the province to put their money into the mill to keep it going? After millions and millions given over the last number of years. NO! NO! NO!

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Keith
    - June 21, 2012 at 08:06:00

    I agree with the Unions vote to turn down the Kruger offer. It seems big business with all the tax braks plus other concessions they get from both the Federal and Provincial governments still want more and they want it from the backs of their workers. They will lose all their qualified staff to other companies and then cry they can't get anyone to work for pennies or thanks to Harper they will bring in labour from some third world country and their wages will be subsidized by our tax dollars. All workers must stand their ground on these issues or we will become another third world country if left to Harper and his henchmen.

    Submit a comment

Submit a comment

Submit a comment (we keep all emails private)
Agreement

We ask that users remain courteous. You may not post insulting, discriminatory or inappropriate content, which may be removed at our discretion. We are not responsible for user content and opinions. Use of this site as well as content submission & ownership are governed by our Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.

Member organizations should be non-profit in nature, and promote legal activities. Any organization found promoting illegal activities or commercial products or services will be deleted from the site.

I agree with these conditions.

Advertising

Business Directory


Milestones Moving Up

Newsletter

Please enter your email to receive our free newsletter

Subscribe to news alerts

Advertising