• Print
  • Send to a friend
  • Comment (17)
  •  

‘Excellent decision’ by citizens in reporting drunk driver: RNC

Gary Kean
Published on August 3, 2012
Published on August 2, 2012
Gary Kean  RSS Feed
Topics :
CORNER BROOK , Wellington Street

CORNER BROOK — The Royal Newfoundland Constabulary is giving kudos to some citizens for the way they handled a person they felt was too drunk to be driving Wednesday night.

After an attempt to prevent the man from getting behind the wheel of his car started to get out of control, the police were called.

The result was a 21-year-old man from St. Fintan's being arrested and charged with impaired driving and with failing the breathalyzer.

Fortunately, the man was not driving and was not in the car when apprehended in the Wellington Street area. However, the witnesses who reported him informed police that he had allegedly been driving while under the influence before police were called.

Const. Scott Mosher, the RNC's acting media relations officer, said the police always encourage the public to get involved when it comes to keeping drunk drivers off the streets.

"Even if it is just suspected impaired driving, the worst thing that can happen is the police go and check it out and nothing comes of it," said Mosher. "It's better to be vigilant."

Mosher confirmed the information provided by the witnesses in Wednesday night's incident was enough to warrant the charges, even though the police had not directly observed the man driving.

"Even though he wasn't technically behind the wheel at the time, you can still put him in care and control of the vehicle based on witness evidence," said Mosher.

Often, the general public will only get involved when information can be provided anonymously. Mosher said it is always good to see people out there willing to go the extra step to be more involved with putting a stop to a potentially dangerous driver.

"It was certainly an excellent decision by them to first try to prevent the driver from getting in his vehicle, which they did, and then to contact the police when things kind of went beyond their level of comfort," said Mosher.

The man was later released from police custody and will have an appearance in provincial court scheduled at a later date.

 

Comments

  • Username
    David
    - August 7, 2012 at 18:42:49

    Most of the comments on this item defending this loser are absolutely infuriuating. Welcome to 21st Century Newfoundland, where a completely intellectually dishonest debate about "rights" is concocted to defend one of the most reprehensible crimes against completely random, innocent people. Too many years of seeing a salmon poacher caught standing next to a pail of dead fish, a gill net at his feet, wearing waders, only to be found not guilty in our joke of a system because the wardens couldn't actually state that they saw him poaching. So bravo, Newfoundland...let these drunken hillbillies keep debating, pretending they have the first clue about civilized living.

    Submit a comment

    • Username
      Mr Corner Brook
      - August 8, 2012 at 09:04:54

      So David has resorted to name calling in this debate (Drunken Hillbillies???). Must have run out of smart a#$ retorts!!! A true sign that you have no idea what you are talking about. Instead of offering valid arguments you insult an entire province! Get angry and sulk all you want; take your ball and go home if you cant match the level of intellect here. If you cant engage in a civillized debate without getting angry and insulting, I really wonder why the Western Star would allow such comments to be posted. You are wrong David and we all think so...get over yourself! relax and have a beer by'!!! Just dont drive! lol

    • Username
      Shawn
      - August 8, 2012 at 11:13:00

      David is showing that he is a creator of the spin. He is one of those that will spin anything and everything to try to force his opinion on the masses and attempt to make them sound logical. Notice how he twists our words to make us out to be defending drunk drivers? Anyone that can read can see this and see the spin he is trying to create. I don't need insults or to create spin to make my point and I'm glad the editors allow David to make his point anyway he can even if it means lies and insults. I'm glad he still has the right to do that. Unfortunately, with Davids train of thought on civil rights and living civilized, he won't have that right much longer.

  • Username
    Friendly Reminder
    - August 4, 2012 at 15:13:33

    what is this place coming to? The young man wasnt even behind the wheel, and is being charged for something he never even did! Its sad that someone can call and report someone for driving. Shawn I agree with you 100%, the next time I see a cop not stop at a stop sign, I guess its my right to call and report it. Since it seems like how this story ended up. Like they say, there's two sides to every story, and right now were only seeing the one!

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    David
    - August 3, 2012 at 15:58:34

    Protecting the rights of drunk drivers before and above those of innocent citizens....exemplary Newfoundlanders, citizens of the 21st century. Kudos.

    Submit a comment

    • Username
      Shawn
      - August 3, 2012 at 17:51:32

      No David, protecting the rights of everyone. Welcome to the 21st Century David, a time when our rights are not etched in stone anymore. A time when if we do not take a stand, we will not be able to. A time when citizens' vision is so clouded by the propaganda they have been fed, they can not see the forest for the trees. Thank You David, for your opinion. You are proof that that we as a society need to be protected from ourselves.

    • Username
      Mr Corner Brook
      - August 4, 2012 at 11:13:00

      David you have completely missed the point. People hear the phrase "drunk driver" and they automatically get caught up in the hype and want to start a lynch mob. Tell me David, what was this man's breathalizer reading at the time he was taken from behind the wheel? You can't answer this because he wasn't caught behind the wheel. Yes, drunk driving has to be dealt with, and harshly, but we must tread lightly around areas like this when our human rights are in question. Who can prove he was actually drunk when he was behind the wheel? You? Read some other points here if you have not. If you had a few beers and I call the police and state I had seen you driving, should that be enough to have you charged. Even if you eventually win in court, its a great expense and hassle on your part. There has to be more than just a phone call from a witness to substantiate a criminal charge.

    • Username
      David
      - August 6, 2012 at 13:23:18

      Yes, it's high time Newfoundland take a stand...in defense of the epidemic, out-of-control crime of killing innocent people with cars while drunk. Why, if we don't stop the police from interfering with this pasttime, where will it all end? With people being sober and attentive behind the wheel? I say never! Yay Shawn! We can only hope that you personally get to expereince your own 'reward moment' compliments of a well-protected drunk driver...a big, permanent thank you!

    • Username
      Shawn
      - August 7, 2012 at 11:40:55

      David, your a prime example of not seeing the forest because of the trees. It is your mindset that has doomed our society by feeding into the spin being thrown.You have lost the ability think for yourself like so many others.Mr. Corner Brook is right, you completely missed the point and I doubt anything anyone says here will make you understand, until it happens to you. Then you too can get your "reward moment" and have your day in court, just like this man in the article. As well, you can rest assured that your tax dollars and mine were well wasted by charging a person they have no hope of convicting. That precedent was set along time ago and without police witnessing this man driving, they have zero chance of conviction.

  • Username
    Sherry
    - August 3, 2012 at 10:42:50

    Shawn, I do agree with you. I guess the person, who is now charged, will have to hire a lawyer and pay through the nose. Did the RNC stop to think this incident could be a case where there is an alternate motive against the accused. I would like to say, " I am shocked." But, No. I am not at all surprised. What is more, I am finding it silly that such a story would make the newspaper. Do reporters write such things just to see if readers are still thinking beings ? Obviously, the police can't expect the public to see this incident as a 'crack down " on drinking and driving. This incident confirms what many people view as the role of the RNC in our province.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Shawn
    - August 3, 2012 at 09:59:09

    So that's all it takes now for charges to be laid against a citizen? Another citizen's word? Does no one else see the wrong in this? Where have our rights and freedoms gone that our fathers and grand fathers fought and died for? Alot will be quick to point out that it helps keep drunk drivers of the roads, without seeing the big picture that could involve them someday. The time when their neighbor gets angry with them for some stupid thing and makes the false call to police as revenge. Then they must defend themselves in court which is a very costly procedure at best. Tell you what, the next time I see a police car roll through a stop sign or fail to use the turn indicator, I'm going to call the police and I will be expecting them to issue a ticket based on my observations. I bet my observations and witness statement won't be enough to warrant a ticket in that situation though will it. The Justice system here in NL has to be the most backward and corrupt in all of Canada.

    Submit a comment

    • Username
      Mr Corner Brook
      - August 3, 2012 at 10:49:44

      And you can bet they will get a conviction! This is ridiculous! This kangaroo court we call a justice system in Newfoundland is corrupt and backwards. Ive personally experienced a situation which the courts would not pursue because they said there was not a reasonable chance of conviction; and this case involved an online predator approaching a juvenile. Because there was no physical contact made he walked. A technicality! We didnt like that, but accepted it! This guy is reported to have been driving drunk, but was not actually caught by the authorities! Not guilty!!! Who says the citizen wasnt holding a grudge? This is an abuse of the system to support an agenda against drunk driving. While I support this agenda, this is wrong in this case!

    • Username
      Common Sense
      - August 3, 2012 at 11:07:11

      Witness evidence has always played a large part in many court cases for your information Shawn.

    • Username
      Shawn
      - August 3, 2012 at 14:47:33

      CS, not when it is the only evidence there is. What is to stop me from calling the RNC right now and telling them that I just saw you driving drunk, even if I know that's not the case. If precedent like the above case is set, they must then go find you, and charge you, regardless of if your drunk in your car or not when they find you. Then we'll see you and your lawyer in court to defend yourself, all at your cost. You may even spend the night in jail until court in the morning. All because of "witness evidence". Does that sound right to you? Don't get me wrong, I would love to see all drunk drivers prosecuted to the full extent of the law, and then some, but not at the expense of our civil rights and freedoms. The RNC knows what they should do to curb drunk driving, yet they won't do it. They wait for opportunities like this to move and then look for a pat on the back for a job well done.

    • Username
      Jason
      - August 3, 2012 at 17:07:39

      Shawn, our fathers and grandfathers did not die for the right to drive drunk.

    • Username
      Shawn
      - August 3, 2012 at 17:58:49

      No Jason, they did not. They died so we have the right to a fair justice system(among many other things). A system that requires checks and balances. A system that should treat each of us fairly and one that is not ruled as a police state. I understand that not everyone will agree my opinions here, but when you are faced with the same situation, you will understand. The problem is, it will be too late then.

  • Username
    corner brook citizen
    - August 3, 2012 at 08:21:47

    Great job there!!!!

    Submit a comment

Submit a comment

Submit a comment (we keep all emails private)
Agreement

We ask that users remain courteous. You may not post insulting, discriminatory or inappropriate content, which may be removed at our discretion. We are not responsible for user content and opinions. Use of this site as well as content submission & ownership are governed by our Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.

Member organizations should be non-profit in nature, and promote legal activities. Any organization found promoting illegal activities or commercial products or services will be deleted from the site.

I agree with these conditions.

Advertising

Business Directory


Milestones Moving Up

Newsletter

Please enter your email to receive our free newsletter

Subscribe to news alerts

Advertising