• Print
  • Send to a friend
  • Comment (7)
  •  

Mayor, councillor butt heads over new policy

Coun. Gary Kelly holds up his personal iPhone in one hand, with his iPad in the other. Kelly and Mayor Neville Greeley butted heads at Monday night’s council meeting over the introduction of the new device policy. — Star photo by Meaghan Philpott

Coun. Gary Kelly holds up his personal iPhone in one hand, with his iPad in the other. Kelly and Mayor Neville Greeley butted heads at Monday night’s council meeting over the introduction of the new device policy. — Star photo by Meaghan Philpott

Published on August 21, 2012
Published on August 21, 2012
Meaghan Philpott  RSS Feed
Topics :
Corner Brook City Council

CORNER BROOK  A new policy at Corner Brook City Council was adopted Monday night, but not before tensions ran high.

Coun. Gary Kelly was eventually cut off from speaking against the policy, which aims to regulate the use of mobile devices by council and staff, by Mayor Neville Greeley, who stated Kelly was out of line.

Kelly asked a series of questions that highlighted some percieved loopholes in the policy and potential areas for security breaches, such as with web-based email, flash drives and public Wi-Fi access.

Greeley said Kelly was asking questions about the policy, but failed to propose any amendments, going in circles with discussion.

The argument got heated when he said he broached security topics several times before with council, to avail.

“Mr. Mayor,” Kelly stated at the council meeting. “I have tried, repeatedly, to have this discussion. It was called silly and, at one point in time, crap.”

The device policy aims to set baseline standards for securing information on technological devices and make city staff members are aware of confidentiality.

Greeley said the policy is supposed to be a start to bringing security issues to light.

“As time goes on we can make amendments to that policy. But we need to get a policy in place,” Greeley said. “It may not be all things to all people. It’s not intended to be a Big Brother.”

Kelly said he was deeply disappointed in the policy that was brought forth to council Monday night.

“Total security is much more than what is indicated in the policy,” Kelly said. “The policy does not reflect reality.”

The policy states that councillors may have to carry an extra device for city matters. For some councillors, that will tally three personal devices, after one for personal use and another for work purposes.

Kelly said his personal iPhone can operate at the same security level as a device given to him from the city, and can be used with the same discretion.

He said using his own device has saved taxpayers $1,600 to $2,000 since he was elected a year and a half ago.

Kelly said the B.Y.O.D (bring your own device) plan is a progressive program being piloted in the province that he would like to see adopted at city hall.

“My concern with using a personal device is the city has no control over it,” Coun. Donna Luther, who voted in favour of the policy.

“Nowhere else in a major organization can you use your own personal device that I’m aware of.”

Ultimately, the policy was adopted 4-2, with councillors Kelly and Linda Chaisson voting against it.

Comments

  • Username
    Edward Smith
    - August 21, 2012 at 19:12:38

    I long for the old days when just about everyone had one phone but it hung on the wall where you lived. If you called someone and it kept ringing, they probably weren't home and then you hung up. If you went to the beach, or went camping you left your phone on the wall and went and enjoyed yourself. Everything was simpler then.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    I live here too
    - August 21, 2012 at 17:16:38

    The city provides these people with BlackBerrys. If they are Apple junkies, so be it. Blackberry provides good security, better the Apple in most cases and it is the chosen equipment by the city. If Mr Kelly wants to use his iPhone for personal use he can but the employer decides what platform the operation will be on. Besides, what the heck does that have to do with the bloody mess this town is in!

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    CB xpat
    - August 21, 2012 at 14:47:36

    Why cut off the discussion? There were valid concerns raised so why force it through? It seems politicians are more concerned with following procedure than actually deciding if something makes sense. Technology is changing rapidly and council is living in the past and really they should open their minds to new ideas. The old ways of doing things are just that, old.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Dennis
    - August 21, 2012 at 14:42:40

    Debate at the council table is a positive new development in the City after almost three years of no public debate and discussion of issues. Hopefully it continues into the next election and beyond and that the real issues important to the future of the City are discussed openly and transparently as was promised in the summer of 2009. Kudos to Councillor Kelly for refusing to be muzzled (anymore).

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Newfoundland Proud
    - August 21, 2012 at 13:48:20

    Welcome to the Dark Ages...Corner Brook style! While I believe that there are potential security issues with all forms of electronic communication, careful consideration should be given to all potential points of weakness. What is alarming here is Council's apparent inconsistent policy regarding BYOD vs. webmail vs. wifi internet access. Anyone with an ounce of IT knowledge knows that allowing any access to webmail or wifi services is paramount to leaving your house with the front door left open. I think I would trust Councillor Kelly using his iPhone before having any councillor using his / her iPad at a public wifi location or checking webmail.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    John W
    - August 21, 2012 at 13:46:57

    About time someone had the guts to stand up and speak there mind to the Mayor. Not only did you give yourself a fancy new blackbery now you are forcing the others to take one as well.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    CBGirl
    - August 21, 2012 at 10:29:24

    One- City Council meetings shpuld be cell phone free for all councillors, mayor and staff. Personal equipment or not. If every councillor is receiving email on their tax payer funded ipads, and have access to the net via that ipad, there is no reason to have their phones with them. Go to a council meeting and watch Gary Kelly reading his texts when he should be paying attention to the meeting. I highlight Gary because i have personally witnessed him, but no doubt others have also read and sent texts during meetings. Two- As for phone use outside the chamber, if a councillor already has a cell phone, there is no need for the city to provide one. The city cannot exercise control of a city purchased iphone, other than restrict internet use. If a member of council already has a phone, which is used for council and personal use, the city should cough up half the bill for usage (not equipment) If the member does not have a phone, and needs one to conduct city business, then they should be provided one, with the bill paid in full by the city. Having city councillors on call at all times of the day (providing both phones and ipads technically does this) will only lead to councillors asking for yet another raise. Gary is right about the security of web based email. Ditch that. Flash drives shouldn't be needed as the city should already be cloud computing or using email. And Wi Fi when it comes to council and staff access should be designated to those members only. You wouldn't let the public on the main network, so why allow access to the wi-fi? If public access is required (which it shouldnt considering the library next door has internet), set up a new public wi-fi spot. Follow me on twitter @_CBGirl

    Submit a comment

Submit a comment

Submit a comment (we keep all emails private)
Agreement

We ask that users remain courteous. You may not post insulting, discriminatory or inappropriate content, which may be removed at our discretion. We are not responsible for user content and opinions. Use of this site as well as content submission & ownership are governed by our Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.

Member organizations should be non-profit in nature, and promote legal activities. Any organization found promoting illegal activities or commercial products or services will be deleted from the site.

I agree with these conditions.

Advertising

Business Directory


Milestones Moving Up

Newsletter

Please enter your email to receive our free newsletter

Subscribe to news alerts

Advertising