• Print
  • Send to a friend
  • Comment (2)
  •  

Don’t attack the messenger on Muskrat Falls: Ball

Dwight Ball

Dwight Ball

Paul  Hutchings
Published on August 22, 2012
Published on August 21, 2012
Paul Hutchings  RSS Feed
Topics :
Emera Inc. , DEER LAKE , Newfoundland

DEER LAKE Humber Valley MHA and opposition leader Dwight Ball wants the attacks to stop in the discussion over the proposed Muskrat Falls project

Responding after hearing a media interview with fellow MHA PC Steve Kent, Ball called it “Disturbing and repugnant” to hear Kent argue that imputing personal motives of persons on the other side of the public debate is not only permissible, but also desirable.

“This will have a chilling and corrosive effect on the public’s participation in the issues facing the province,” said Ball. “When it has become official government policy to use the machinery of government to attack the motives of critics, why would anyone say anything?”

The proposed hydro-electricity project would include a transmission link from Labrador to Newfoundland that would cost approximately $2.1 billion, with about $600 million of that coming from Emera Inc. A 30-kilometre underwater connection across the Strait of Bell Isle would also be installed.

Ball said that it has been a longstanding principle of public discussion that you attack the position and not the person. But now, he said, the Kent interview shows a government representative implying that attacking the person is the preferred, legitimate to address matters of public interest.

“The hypocrisy of government’s policy to attack the personal motives of critics is incredible,” said Ball. “They feel entitled to make personal attacks while they vigorously protest whenever their own motivations are called into question.”

newsroom@thewesternstar.com

Comments

  • Username
    Dennis
    - August 22, 2012 at 09:19:13

    Very well said Mr. Ball: “The hypocrisy of government’s policy to attack the personal motives of critics is incredible,” said Ball. “They feel entitled to make personal attacks while they vigorously protest whenever their own motivations are called into question.” As someone whose motives were personally attacked for expressing an opinion at the municipal level here, I thank-you for your comments. It is my experience that when parties resort to such low tactics it has because they have lost the evidentiary debate and that they now must resort to discrediting any credible evidence by attempting to discredit the source of the evidence. Thank-you Mr. Ball for calling it like it is!

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    truth be told
    - August 22, 2012 at 06:11:01

    Steve Kent? You wanna talk to be about Steve Kent? Is there anyone outside of Da Pearl taking this guy seriously? Steve Kent?

    Submit a comment

Submit a comment

Submit a comment (we keep all emails private)
Agreement

We ask that users remain courteous. You may not post insulting, discriminatory or inappropriate content, which may be removed at our discretion. We are not responsible for user content and opinions. Use of this site as well as content submission & ownership are governed by our Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.

Member organizations should be non-profit in nature, and promote legal activities. Any organization found promoting illegal activities or commercial products or services will be deleted from the site.

I agree with these conditions.

Advertising

Business Directory

Milestones Moving Up

Newsletter

Please enter your email to receive our free newsletter

Subscribe to news alerts

Advertising