• Print
  • Send to a friend
  • Comment (3)
  •  

No crime committed, say RNC investigators

Published on August 25, 2012
Published on August 24, 2012
Meaghan Philpott  RSS Feed

Police don’t know what happened beyond fire being an accident

The Royal Newfoundland Constabulary reiterated Friday that Wednesday night’s residential fire which extensively damaged a house at 6 McWhirters Lane was not suspicious.

Thursday, the RNC said the fire was accidental, but did not release specifics of what caused the fire.

“We determine if the fire is suspicious or criminal in nature,” RNC Insp. Terry Corbin said. “And if not, by default it’s accidental.”

RNC policy is to leave details at that, Corbin said. Similar to vehicle accidents, he said, it is up to the insurance companies to pinpoint the exact cause of fire for insurance purposes.

“From the RNC’s perspective, if it doesn’t appear to be criminal, that’s as far was we go,” Corbin said.

He said when RNC fire investigators make their call on the nature of the fire, they take into account the setting.

“The house was old,” he said. “You have to (account for) what state it was left in, how well it was cared for, and whatever other issues.”

The house was being inhabited until May when more that 200 cats were removed from the residence. A shed on the property was also destroyed.

 

 

Comments

  • Username
    Artie
    - August 25, 2012 at 14:28:17

    Well I guess the smell of cat feces and urine is now old news, but based on the performance of the powers that be, I expect the neighbors will now be sniffing the smell of burned out charred wood and vinyl for the next few years. I also did not know that fires causes defaulted to accidental in the absence of anything obvious. Maybe it is just me, but if a desperate person stole some milk from a store cause he/she had a hungry child at home, that is an act of pure desperation, not criminal. It is not suspicious either, if a child is hungry some will carry the cow to feed them. Sound silly maybe, but a few years ago, I had a family member burned to death in the middle of the afternoon in a house. There was an "investigation" and the fire was deemed non-suspicious. Mind you they closed the case stating they could not determine the cause of the fire and could not determine the cause of death. What does that default to??

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Seadog Matches
    - August 25, 2012 at 10:27:11

    "From the RNC’s perspective." And O.J. Simpson was found NOT GUILTY in a criminal case but found GUILTY in a civil case. So who is going to be the first one to chock and rat on his buddy? CFCB No loss of life. A CONDEMNED building by two contractors. No one willing to step up to the plate before this all happened. Can you expect any other outcome?

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Mr. Corner Brook
    - August 25, 2012 at 08:33:31

    Good job boys! UNREAL!!!! Our tax dollars well spent!

    Submit a comment

Submit a comment

Submit a comment (we keep all emails private)
Agreement

We ask that users remain courteous. You may not post insulting, discriminatory or inappropriate content, which may be removed at our discretion. We are not responsible for user content and opinions. Use of this site as well as content submission & ownership are governed by our Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.

Member organizations should be non-profit in nature, and promote legal activities. Any organization found promoting illegal activities or commercial products or services will be deleted from the site.

I agree with these conditions.

Advertising

Business Directory


Milestones Moving Up

Newsletter

Please enter your email to receive our free newsletter

Subscribe to news alerts

Advertising