• Print
  • Send to a friend
  • Comment (2)
  •  

New trial ordered in Nelson Hart case

Nelson Hart sits in the prisoner’s dock during his Supreme Court murder trial in Gander in this file photo.

Nelson Hart sits in the prisoner’s dock during his Supreme Court murder trial in Gander in this file photo.

Published on September 17, 2012
Published on September 17, 2012
Topics :
Rights , Gander Lake

The Newfoundland Supreme Court of Appeal today ordered a new trial in the case of Nelson Hart who had been convicted in 2007 of murder in the drowning deaths of his twin three-year-old daughters in Gander Lake on Aug. 4, 2002.

The appeals court unanimously stated that a new trial should be ordered because Hart, in light of his tendency toward epileptic seizures and his difficulty in thinking and speaking clearly under stress with a large number of people around, should have been permitted to testify with the public excluded from the courtroom, but with audio or video transmission to those outside.

Also, the decision states, a majority decision by Chief Justice Derek Green, with Justice Michael Harrington concurring, ordered a new trial because the evidence of confessions obtained from Hart as a result of police pretending to be criminals in a “Mr. Big” sting was obtained by improper coercion and inducements in breach of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, and should not have been admitted at the trial.

Justice Leo Barry dissented finding no excessive coercion or abuse of process and would have admitted the Mr. Big evidence.

Hart was convicted on March 28, 2007 of two counts of first-degree murder by a jury in Newfoundland Supreme Court trial division.

Comments

  • Username
    Shirley Lane
    - September 18, 2012 at 10:38:40

    Honestly I cannot understand this decision..The man did commit murder..no question..why are we wasting our taxpayers money on another trial ??? The man should NOT be allowed even a review for another 25 years..He sure needs help but certainly not freedom.. I question Social Services here..his wife was a homecare worker with him..wasn't that a conflict of interest to begin with..why was that allowed to continue and then the end result was two beautiful innocent little girls died. Someone ,somewhere should have to answer for this too !

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Ben
    - September 17, 2012 at 19:26:31

    Oh my the justice system...those poor innocent children who never had a chance...We need to overhaul our judicial system

    Submit a comment

Submit a comment

Submit a comment (we keep all emails private)
Agreement

We ask that users remain courteous. You may not post insulting, discriminatory or inappropriate content, which may be removed at our discretion. We are not responsible for user content and opinions. Use of this site as well as content submission & ownership are governed by our Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.

Member organizations should be non-profit in nature, and promote legal activities. Any organization found promoting illegal activities or commercial products or services will be deleted from the site.

I agree with these conditions.

Advertising

Business Directory


Milestones Moving Up

Newsletter

Please enter your email to receive our free newsletter

Subscribe to news alerts

Advertising