• Print
  • Send to a friend
  • Comment (3)
  •  

Onus on hunters to move further away from populated areas

Gary Kean
Published on October 14, 2012
Published on October 12, 2012
Gary Kean  RSS Feed
Topics :
Department of Justice , Carberry , Lewin Parkway , Moose Management Area

CORNER BROOK  Wildlife roaming into populated areas is not the only problem resulting from the urban sprawl on the outskirts of Corner Brook.

With neighbourhoods like those in the Sunnyslope Drive and Carberry’s Road area continuing to further into forested areas, some hunters have not been taking note that they can no longer stalk their prey in some areas were hunting has traditionally been permitted.

This fall’s big game hunting season is only a month old, but one hunter has already been charged under Section 111 (1) of the provincial Wildlife Regulations. That piece of legislation states that no one can discharge a firearm within 1,000 metres of a school, playground or school or within 300 metres of a dwelling.

Sheldon Anstey, acting chief of enforcement for the fish and wildlife enforcement division of the Department of Justice, said the person who was charged actually came forth because he believed the moose he had shot may have been taken illegally.

The moose was killed in a boggy area just off the north side of the Lewin Parkway. That is considered part of Moose Management Area 6, which is open to the annual moose hunt.The subsequent investigation determined the moose had been killed within a kilometre of a playground, even though the kill was further than 300 metres away from the nearest home.

“Ten years ago, you may have been quite safe hunting ducks in the ponds you hunted for 50 years or hunting moose in a certain bog, but now there’s a subdivision on the back of that,” said Anstey.

“So, what we’re getting is not only human-wildlife conflicts where you have bears and coyotes in around town, you have this hunting conflict and people calling us because they are hearing gunshots coming from a gully or pond that’s too close to their house.”

The violation is considered more of a firearms offence than a big game offence, so the licensed hunter in this particular case was issued a summary offence ticket and had four quarters of moose seized. 

If he wishes to contest the ticket, he can do so in provincial court Dec. 4. His big game licence is considered filled for this season, but the hunter may apply for another licence next year.

The maximum penalty for discharging a firearm without exercising reasonable care for the safety of others is a $500 fine or six months in prison, or both. It will be $75 if he doesn’t contest it.

“We have seen a general trend over the last number of years of this type of incident rising and rising and have had a fair number this fall,” said Anstey. “All of the complaints are investigated. If it’s determined an offence has happened, they will be prosecuted.”

Anstey did not have any numbers on how many offences there have been so far this hunting season.

“The onus is on the hunter to know where they are hunting,” he said. “They have to be cognizant of where residences and playgrounds and schools are.”

Comments

  • Username
    BC Newfie
    - October 16, 2012 at 04:13:14

    LONEWOLF; My friend i can tell you i live in Vancouver and i have traveled to Russia many times, and there is no way Russia would fine you for such an offence, hunting there is a way of life and government UNDERSTANDS that, only in Newfoundland are people so power hungry and petty to fine a man who comes forward trying to do the right thing, Only in Newfoundland do people fear people inforcing the laws, and Only in Newfoundland do you get the option to have your fine quadrupled if you question the person imposing the fine, 22 years i have been away from there nice to see the stone age justice still exsists, makes no wonder police and conservation officers are so hated there,and it makes no wonder they are not trusted, give the poor guy a break,if he had not come forward he would be 75 bucks richer, have a freezer full of meat and nobody would have known a thing, instead he is honest and gets screwed, this will make everyone think twice before ever doing the rite thing again, and only further enhance the distrust they have for authority, good work Ansty, bet your neighbors invite you to the next BBQ,

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Lonewolf
    - October 14, 2012 at 16:40:17

    A fine is something you get knowingly breaking the law, if this man went to wildlife after the fact it is plain to see he didn't know and was honest enough to come forward and for this he is punished. This is wrong and to top it all of , if he don't fight for his rights then he will get a discount, so this is taking away the rights of people who can't afford to fight for them. So Good-bye Canada and hello Russia.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    barney fife
    - October 14, 2012 at 15:53:37

    300 hundred meters from a house is still way too close, that's about a 1/4 kilometer which is spitting distance. Whoever came up with that distance knows nothing about the killing distance of a high powered rifle.

    Submit a comment

Submit a comment

Submit a comment (we keep all emails private)
Agreement

We ask that users remain courteous. You may not post insulting, discriminatory or inappropriate content, which may be removed at our discretion. We are not responsible for user content and opinions. Use of this site as well as content submission & ownership are governed by our Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.

Member organizations should be non-profit in nature, and promote legal activities. Any organization found promoting illegal activities or commercial products or services will be deleted from the site.

I agree with these conditions.

Advertising

Business Directory

Milestones Moving Up

Newsletter

Please enter your email to receive our free newsletter

Subscribe to news alerts

Advertising