• Print
  • Send to a friend
  • Comment (6)
  •  

Managing the moose; Sessions giving the public a say on future quotas, policies

From left, Larry Parsons, Sharon Brake and Craig Wiseman use a keypad to enter their answers to questions posed at a moose management planning public consulation session held at Marble Mountain on Monday, Oct. 29, 2012. Geraldine Brophy

From left, Larry Parsons, Sharon Brake and Craig Wiseman use a keypad to enter their answers to questions posed at a moose management planning public consulation session held at Marble Mountain on Monday, Oct. 29, 2012.

Published on October 30, 2012
Published on October 29, 2012
Jamie Bennett  RSS Feed
Topics :
Marble Mountain Resort , Wildlife Division , Department of Environment and Conservation , Steady Brook , Marystown , Plum Point

STEADY BROOK — With over 40 years experience as a moose hunter, Larry Parsons has plenty of opinions about the current state of the species in the province.

Parsons was one of dozens of participants Monday at the Marble Mountain Resort in Steady Brook for the provincial government’s latest public consultation session on developing a five-year moose management plan.

Sessions have also been held in St. John’s, Clarenville, Marystown, L’Anse au Clair and Plum Point, with more to come in Grand Falls-Windsor and Port aux Basques.

Unlike typical public consultations, these sessions have participants form into small groups where they are asked to discuss a variety of topics and submit their input via a computer which is provided to each group. The questions range from such issues as the benefits of moose in the province to maintaining hunter satisfaction.

Parsons said the format made for some good debate. He said there were common themes and interests from the group he was part of.

“I’m sitting next to an outfitter and they have the same problem,” Parsons said Monday during a break in the session. “They don’t want to see the moose population down because it’s expensive for hunters in the States to come to Newfoundland. If they aren’t going to get a moose, they aren’t going to come.”

The moose population was a major concern for Parsons, who believes the government has spent too much time in recent years trying to drive moose numbers down, rather than paying attention to what’s really happening with the species.

“I don’t want to see them continue to decrease the population of the moose because I think that’s going down fast enough on its own,” he said, noting the closure of paper mills in Stephenville and Grand Falls-Windsor meant less clear cutting and thus, reduced suitable moose habits. “The government is making a knee-jerk reaction to the opinions of a few people. The government isn’t listening to the technicians.”

Statistics provided in a handout given to all participants appear to back Parsons’ claim.

After peaking at 150,000 animals in 1997, the moose population has seen steady decline to approximately 114,000 animals today. Despite the trend, the government’s moose quota has risen in each of the last seven years and included a 2011 quota of nearly 35,000 moose, the highest quota in the last 27 years.

While he admits he’s concerned about moose-vehicle collisions, he said he tends to slow down at night and would advise other motorists to do the same rather than looking for a solution from government.

For his part, John Blake, director of the Wildlife Division of the Department of Environment and Conservation, said the format of the sessions was designed to get diverse views from all those who have an interest in moose management.

“It’s informed discussion, it’s constructive dialogue,” Blake said. “There are benefits to having open sessions where people can just go to a microphone and say their view, but this is a more structured way of doing that.”

Through previous sessions, he said it’s becoming clear that there are regional differences in what people want to see, with people in places like the Northern Peninsula having a very different opinion about desireable moose numbers than those in St. John’s, for example.

He said while his department has a handle on the biological aspects of moose management, the sessions will provide a clearer view of the interests of the people when establishing quotas.

“We haven’t been very good at understanding the various views of people from across the province,” he said. “Having some mechanism to evaluate that in a fare, objective manner is what this session is all about. That kind of social input, along with the biological input and other factors we know of, will form a plan for the future.”

 

 

 

Comments

  • Username
    ONT NEWFIE
    - October 31, 2012 at 13:49:17

    I totaly agree with the B C Newfie I could not have said it better Lets look afer our own and give lic. to the people who hunt for food not antlers

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    hunter
    - October 31, 2012 at 12:09:25

    Maybe its not the fault of the moose or the outfitter, or anyone who thinks there is room for any big game on the island. Maybe the car companies should be sued for not making moose proof cars. Maybe the provincial government should be sued for paving the roads allowing 100km / hr speeds. Maybe its natures fault, after all most of the accidents happen after dark, so why does the sun go down. It must be someones fault. Why is it so hard to admit any personal responsibility in these accidents. The moose are out there, we are all aware of it. If you think you you will hit a moose on the highway don't drive. Its your choice, and nobody or anythings fault but your own. I feel for those who have lost loved ones but in the end its a personal choice every time a person gets in a car.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Mac white
    - October 31, 2012 at 03:00:46

    This guy is not well if he thinks his opinion is valid,imagine putting a monitary value on our lives,either fence the whole island or get rid of the"bog donkeys"

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    lonewolf
    - October 30, 2012 at 21:58:31

    Will now you know , if you or someone you know gets injured or killed because of Moose, sue the outfitter.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    BC Newfie
    - October 30, 2012 at 14:06:35

    Who cares what it cost for an American to go to Newfoundland and get a moose, god forbid they would have to take a walk in the woods to find a moose, its called hunting people, give more licences to native Newfoundlanders, feed your own people, if Americans want moose there are moose in America,Why has the mentality of Newfoundland never changed? why does Newfoundland have to give to others before they take care of their own? it's always the same story there, a project opens and they hire people from quebec, the States, anywhere but Hometown people, Give the fish to the russians and Japan, Give the forest to America, give the moose to America, For the love of god take care of your own people, produce something in the province, Sell the Americans the rack this is all they come for anyway, people say Newfies are stupid, No there are smart educated people there but the Government would never give them a chance,what a backwards thinking place, makes me so angry, the only stupid thing i see there is after so long there has not been a revolt, uprising, most opressed people anywhere in Canada, I mean for god sakes who knows Newfoundland better than a Newfie? As i see it it is quite simple, give more licences to locals, less population drives them further in the woods because there is more area for them to call home teritory, Newfies won't mind a walk in the woods, keeps them off the road and locals out of danger, I mean honestly do you think you will kill the moose population there? 114,000 moose, and i am sure someone counted every one, i'd say the number is closer to 250,000, there are moose there everywhere you look,

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Sharon
    - October 30, 2012 at 11:12:43

    I do not understand why someone would want to keep the moose here to look after the needs of hunters coming to the province rather than looking out for our own....too many have died and have been disabled because of the moose population. To advise motorist to slow down at night....do he really think all moose vehicles happen at night.If he should look at statistics he will surely find that all moose vehicle accidents happen all hours in the day.Who is looking after the ones who are laying in hospitals due to moose coming in on their lap from an accident, who cannot eat or use the washroom by themselves?Should we be paying more attention to those who need assistance from the government but cant get it because the government is too busy trying to find ways to keep the outsiders coming in to moose hunt....pathetic! The government bought them here in the first place the government should be responsible for all damages, hospital bills,all medication and health care workers to help those families in need.We all know thats not the case.I know first hand that those who need help are not getting it.To those who would rather help out the outsiders to come and get their moose, i sincerely hope you or a family member never gets in a position to need someone come in to feed you, dress you and simply do any chore that we all take for granted.Who thinks of these people?

    Submit a comment

Submit a comment

Submit a comment (we keep all emails private)
Agreement

We ask that users remain courteous. You may not post insulting, discriminatory or inappropriate content, which may be removed at our discretion. We are not responsible for user content and opinions. Use of this site as well as content submission & ownership are governed by our Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.

Member organizations should be non-profit in nature, and promote legal activities. Any organization found promoting illegal activities or commercial products or services will be deleted from the site.

I agree with these conditions.

Advertising

Business Directory


Milestones Moving Up

Newsletter

Please enter your email to receive our free newsletter

Subscribe to news alerts

Advertising