Oceanex boss not backing down over Marine Atlantic criticism

Paul
Paul Hutchings
Send to a friend

Send this article to a friend.

The Oceanex site is shown in this 2011 photo. — Star file photo

Oceanex boss Sid Hynes maintains Marine Atlantic’s receipt of federal government subsidies have forced his marine shipping business out of the Port of Corner Brook.

Hynes said Marine Atlantic's cost recovery from the federal government, which was 67.7 per cent for the 2012-13 year, makes it difficult to do any marine freight business.

Hynes, a former Marine Atlantic chairperson, called it “competing with our own tax dollars," and asserted that those subsidies are against marine transportation policy in Canada.

Section 5B of the National Transportation Act states that “Regulation and strategic public intervention are used to achieve economic, safety, security, environmental or social outcomes that cannot be achieved satisfactorily by competition and market forces and do not unduly favour, or reduce the inherent advantages of, any particular mode of transportation.”

Hynes said that when he was at the helm of Marine Atlantic, the subsidies were no more than 25 per cent.

“I don’t know what we’re going to do, but we’ll do what we have to,” he said. “At the end of the day we’ll take this to court and let them decide.”

Humber-St. Barbe-Baie Verte MP Gerry Byrne takes issue with Hynes’ statements, especially those concerning the national policy.

The Liberal MP said nothing has been found to be wrong with the subsidies in question when put under a microscope.

“I don’t believe for one second that a constitutional guarantee is subservient to an interpretation of a policy. I think the opposite is true,” he said. “The auditor general of Canada has conducted two special legislative audits on Marine Atlantic and they never indicated there is a problem with the legal authority to receive these subsidies and to charge the freight rates that currently exist.”

Byrne added that it isn’t not just this province’s ferry service receiving subsidies. Similar marine organizations in Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, Prince Edward Island and British Columbia can also count government funds as a source of income.

“He took over at Oceanex knowing full well the economic realities of a constitutionally guaranteed service, for which he personally recommended that rates across the board should go down,” said Byrne of a 2005 Marine Atlantic strategy report recommending a 15 per cent rate reduction and 44 per cent cost recovery. Hynes was the chair of the advisory committee that wrote the report.  

Hynes resigned as chairperson of Marine Atlantic in 2004. He took over as CEO of Oceanex in 2007.

“To suddenly cry foul and put on a poor face is nothing but a slap in the face to everyone in this province,” Byrne said.

The MP also said it’s a slap to pocketbooks, stating that getting rid of subsidies means higher prices on groceries and other items, which Hynes called preposterous.

“What started as an issue of the Port of Corner Brook has now bloomed into an issue of the constitutional rights of everyone in this province and the greed that has been expressed by a single private operator trying to maximize their own operation.”

As for the lease with the Port of Corner Brook, Hynes said it is a private manner within a private company and would not discuss the issue further.

Organizations: Marine Atlantic, Oceanex, Liberal MP

Geographic location: Port of Corner Brook.Hynes, Canada, Port of Corner Brook Nova Scotia New Brunswick Prince Edward Island British Columbia

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Thanks for voting!

Top of page

Comments

Comments

Recent comments

  • MIke from Canmore
    June 19, 2014 - 12:44

    If Oceanex could operate as a private tax paying company, and the $175-200 million annual subsidy to Marine Atlantic be eliminated or reduced - that seems like a win-win to me.

  • Tunnel Fan
    March 31, 2014 - 15:10

    Maybe time to rethink and commence a tunnel link to and from Newfoundland to get rid of both of these entities and their excessive fees that gouge us here on the island!

  • Jack
    March 29, 2014 - 06:45

    Since Sid Hynes used to work for Marine Atlantic, but now waging war against them, I'm not surprised that the Canadian Government have not charged him with "Conflict of Interest". Secondly, over the last four years, Marine Atlantic funding has been cut dramatically, resulting in higher and higher ferry rates. You also don't realize that Marine Atlantic is not a freight service, its a ferry service, so do Newfoundlanders and Labradorians a favour and get your facts examined before passing judgement and falsehoods. Captain Hynes, if Marine Atlantic is so heavily subsidized like you think, Newfoundlanders and Labradorians wouldn't have to endure one rate increase after another every year without regulatory approval. Perhaps now is the time for the Canadian Government and the Newfoundland and Labrador people to stop Captain Hynes from going against an organization he once served like Marine Atlantic or be in more serious trouble for "Conflict of Interest". In the name of Newfoundland and Labrador, "Down With Captain Hynes".

    • john doe
      March 30, 2014 - 17:58

      well it is part of the terms of agreeement but having his hand in the cookie jar and now complaining about it...well this is a bit of a conflict of interest.....maybe it time for someone to put an underground tunnel across the gulf and that way get rid of all the fees that seem to inject when ever they feel like it.....wouldn't have to pay fuel surcharge fees because the public would have to travel on their own...and that way get rid of the big blue eye sore that is in the harbor......yes jobs would be gone but maybe able to entice other business here that could compete like other companies