• Print
  • Send to a friend
  • Comment (13)
  •  

If you go out after dark today …

Dara Squires
Published on October 31, 2012
Published on October 30, 2012
Dara Squires  RSS Feed
Topics :
CBC , United States Department of Justice , Provincial Advisory Council on the Status of Women , George Street , Newfoundland

If they don’t want to get raped, women should not go out alone after dark. In fact, the vast majority of rapes, according to the United States Department of Justice, happen between 6 p.m. and 6 a.m.

So perhaps the advice given by Linda Ross, president of the Provincial Advisory Council on the Status of Women is not so inane, insensitive and offensive as it first seemed to me.

In response to a question posed by CBC reporter Curtis Rumbolt, “So what kind of tips do you give tips or how do you handle this when an item (RNC advisory on a series of sexual assaults) like this comes up?”

Ross replied, “It’s so important for women to take precautions when they’re walking. And one of them is — as much as possible do not walk or go anywhere by yourself when it’s dark.”

Most women are pretty aware of the precautions they have to take to protect themselves. Because most women live in fear of being raped, we have the “tips” down pat. Of course these precautions didn’t help the young woman recently assaulted outside The Rooms in St. John’s. She was walking alone — yes — but not that late in the evening and she had her cellphone and was talking to someone when she was assaulted.

And yet, she was still assaulted. Ross says, “I think the important thing is to always be aware of the precautions that you can take to avoid having something happen.” Precautions like going out with friends, not walking alone, using your cellphone and not leaving drinks unattended when downtown.

I guess, then, that the recent victims of sexual assaults on George Street were not following these precautions. After all, Ross says following them will allow you to “avoid having something happen.”

Except, you see, they were following those same precautions that every woman knows. As Fiona Cunningham, certified counsellor and columnist for The Independent, noticed: “The RNC has said that in each case the attacker was known to the woman. Perhaps the survivors were following this great advice and drinking with him to start with.”

Fiona continues: “And do not go anywhere after dark? Like all women should be on lockdown by 4:30 p.m. during the winter in Newfoundland or else they were asking for it?”

And that is the essential problem with Ross’ advice. When Rumbolt asked for tips or ways of handling the information he was probably looking for exactly the response Ross gave. But this was her chance to really stand up for the women of this province and not pay into the victim-blaming rape culture we all live in.

Why did she assume he meant tips for women? How about tips for George Street businesses, local law enforcement and men?

How about all bars supply drink testing strips for free to women — they’re not that costly and would allow a woman who accidentally left her drink for a moment to test for the presence of Rohypnol or Ketamine — the two most common “rape drugs.”

Or, allow women to get a new drink if they come to the bar with a half-finished one which they realize was unattended momentarily. Or, provide a lockdown service for drinks so that a woman can check her drink in behind the bar when she goes to the bathroom or dance floor and retrieve it when she comes back.

How about bouncers trained in recognizing the signs of drugs being used or drunkenness beyond the ability to consent stop “couples” at the door to do a safety check? How about more law enforcement downtown, looking for more than bar brawls?

How about instead of telling women not to go out alone ’cause they might get raped or telling them that it’s their responsibility to protect their friends we tell men not to go out alone because they might find themselves wanting to rape someone.

Tell men to stay with their male friends to prevent them from raping a woman. Tell men that if they can’t go drinking without feeling the urge to slip drugs into a woman’s drink then they shouldn’t be drinking. Tell men to stay home after dark so they don’t accidentally find themselves in a dark alley forcing themselves on a woman.

Any of those would’ve been better tips than the victim-blaming “tips” reported on CBC. I’m sure every woman who was assaulted smacked herself in the forehead and said “oh, how could I have been so stupid? I could’ve prevented this after all.”

The sad thing is that those victims are likely already blaming themselves, just as their friends are blaming themselves for not doing something to prevent the assault. The truth, though, is that women and their friends cannot prevent rape. They’ve never had that power and they never will. And yet it is the one crime where we feel obliged to put the onus on the victim to prevent it.

No one ever tells a robbed store owner that they were open too late or that they should’ve had their friend across the street watching out for them or that the way they displayed their wares made people want to steal them. No one ever asks the man who was mugged if he had been drinking that evening or if he led the mugger on. But when a woman is raped it’s because she didn’t do enough to prevent it.

Ross could’ve made these same points in her interviews following the RNC advisory. But she chose not to. She chose, instead, to feed the victim blaming with tips for women, rather than provide tips for our society as a whole.

And that does nothing to advance or protect the status of women in our province.

You can comment on this column or access previous editions of Readily A Parent using the following short link: http://bit.ly/DaraSquires.

Comments

  • Username
    Newsreader
    - November 5, 2012 at 14:53:59

    Very well put, Geoff. @What U C: Do you really have nothing else to say on the issue? Saying you made a valid point does not mean that I agree with you completely or wholeheartedly. In fact, I prompted you to say more so readers can understand how far your argument goes. But the brilliance bound up in your thirty or so words is supposed to speak for itself, I suppose. And if your argument consists of simply repeating the same phrase, then, yes, I have no problem calling it nonsense. Commenting is one thing, explaining quite another - and it's plain that you have nothing much at all to say. Nonetheless, I'll put it to you again. Imagine a woman takes acts on Linda Ross's advice and takes all possible precautions. In spite of these efforts, she becomes a victim of sexual assault. In your view, is she partly to blame for her own assault? Did she fail in some way? Is it that men are going to rape as a matter of course, and women's tactical errors are to blame if men attack and hurt them? And are women truly on their own when it comes to being safe? Can they not reasonably expect support in this?

    Submit a comment

    • Username
      what u c
      - November 5, 2012 at 22:42:58

      @newsreader. To be clear you said "I worry that your comment suggests a woman being ultimately at fault if she becomes a victim of assault." In no way did I say that or anything close to that. The victim is not at fault in any way. The fault only lies with the criminal. I don't see how anyone can write off all advice that might help someone protect themselves. No doubt a specific tip may indeed blame a victim and they should be rejected but to claim all tips are the same as blaming the victim will only lead to surpressing valid tips for fear of being accused of blaming the victim. No one said that these tips were all that were needed. Dara made reasonable suggestions and nobody is labelling her suggestions as blaming bouncers, or the police, or bar owners or men. We've heard tips on how to better protect ourselves from other crimes and no one jumps claiming that those suggestions are blaming the victim. If you were thinking about the past victims when you heard these tips then maybe they sounded like they were blaming the victim. I heard them from the point of view of trying to prevent the next attack. Any other support to prevent these crimes would be great. Afterall, these are not just crimes against the victim but also against our society. But that doesn't mean we should reject information that an individual can use to help protect themselves.

  • Username
    Geoff Meeker
    - November 4, 2012 at 08:19:07

    To all those people who defend Linda Ross and fall back on the "you are responsible for your own safety" line, I think you should read the column again. All the way to the end, this time. Dara does acknowledge that women need to follow "the rules." But she points out that, too often, the rules don't work and women are assaulted anyway. And she offers more tips - tangible, practical suggestions - that could involve police, bar owners and staff, and others in preventing sexual assault. By not accepting that and arguing that it is up to women to protect themselves, you continue to blame the victim in a manner that I find most most insidious.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Newsreader
    - November 2, 2012 at 19:24:57

    @What U C; Any non-thinking person can express nonsense in a line and a half; then, when someone disagrees, protest that they were "misinterpreted." As for your initial comment, I think I understand it just fine - since there wasn't much to it. The columnist's criticism of Linda Ross's comments was detailed, while your comments don't show much willingness to understand the issue or express a clear position on it.

    Submit a comment

    • Username
      What u c
      - November 3, 2012 at 10:24:56

      @newsreader. Now take that nonsense you just wrote and with that in mind re-read your original post to me. See if you recognize your hypocrisy. I doubt if you could. You prefer to twist words and accuse people of saying things they didn't say. How dare anyone possess a different opinion.

  • Username
    Newsreader
    - November 1, 2012 at 11:34:07

    @What U C; You make a valid point, but is that enough? Are women not better off -- and safer -- when they have key players on their side? Also, I worry that your comment suggests a woman being ultimately at fault if she becomes a victim of assault. Is it due to a failing on her part?

    Submit a comment

    • Username
      What u c
      - November 2, 2012 at 10:44:07

      @newsreader. You don't need to worry about my comment only how you misinterpreted it. I'd be more worried about people who twist tips on protecting yourself into blaming victims.

  • Username
    What u C
    - November 1, 2012 at 09:14:11

    I disagree. I didn't take Ross's tips as "blaming the victim". I took it as a reminder that when it comes to your safety the only person you can rely on is you.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    AdeleK
    - October 31, 2012 at 20:16:24

    A lack of awareness of our surroundings can be a contributing factor to any crime. There is a significant difference between "blaming the victim" and reinforcing the fact that EVERYONE can avoid contributing to known risk factors. A lack of awareness of our surroundings and dangerous situations can increase the risk of being a victim of any violent crime and for women, this includes sexual assault.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    MotherNight
    - October 31, 2012 at 15:43:55

    I completely agree victim blaming needs to end as soon as possible. However, these tips are given to the VICTIM and not the ATTACKER because the attackers are obviously complete psychopaths who have no remorse for doing something like that to a women. Telling a potential rapist "Don't go out without a buddy in case you rape someone!" is like telling Edmund Kemper "Here, give this nice lady a ride home - but be nice!". The idea is that they are not going to take preventative measures because they have issues causing them to WANT to rape women, while women don't want to be raped. I don't agree with victim blaming, at all, in fact my sister was a victim of sexual assault and our entire town blamed her despite the fact she was kidnapped and missing for 3 days and came back bruised and torn. There were the same questions "Why were you out walking so late at night?" and "Do you often go out by yourself with older men?" and she was just a 14 year old girl! Disgusting, incompetent investigating by the RCMP. That being said, telling women to not go out by themselves is much more effective than trying to school someone with no remorse or empathy to take precautions not to hurt another human being.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    kmac
    - October 31, 2012 at 09:41:25

    Well written and well argued! I'm so fed up with the idea that women are solely responsible for preventing sexual assault! Men should be educated and taught that women are not here on earth solely as pleasure units to be controlled and manipulated.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    WSReader
    - October 31, 2012 at 09:22:33

    Oh Dara - again with the polarizing. She's the president of the council for Status of Women, not Status of Bar Owners or general public. Do you really think by telling women to beware of their surroundings that it is placing blame on victims? I politely disagree.

    Submit a comment

    • Username
      Newsreader
      - October 31, 2012 at 09:58:00

      @WSREADER, and what about when women take all risk factors into account, but become victims of assault anyway? That's the problem the columnist is addressing, and which Linda Ross failed to address in her "tips." It's not productive to keep repeating the same advice to women, telling them to beware of their surroundings. They've heard it a million times, and assaults still occur because women have only so much control in preventing attack. Therefore, it makes perfect sense to take the message regarding women's safety further - to include business owners, police, male companions, bar security staff - who are essentially 'partners' in women's safety and well-being when they go out. That's the point that the columnist is trying to get across.

Submit a comment

Submit a comment (we keep all emails private)
Agreement

We ask that users remain courteous. You may not post insulting, discriminatory or inappropriate content, which may be removed at our discretion. We are not responsible for user content and opinions. Use of this site as well as content submission & ownership are governed by our Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.

Member organizations should be non-profit in nature, and promote legal activities. Any organization found promoting illegal activities or commercial products or services will be deleted from the site.

I agree with these conditions.

Advertising

Business Directory


Milestones Moving Up

Newsletter

Please enter your email to receive our free newsletter

Subscribe to news alerts

Advertising