 |






 |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
| Last updated at 2:11 AM on 12/08/09 |
Stricter enforcement, more responsibility needed: dog expert 
CORNER BROOK GARY KEAN The Western Star
|
 |
| LeeAnn O’Reilly and her purebred Rottweiler Enzo. — Submitted photo |
|
LeeAnn O’Reilly says public education, in addition to stricter laws and regulations, are the key to fostering more responsible dog ownership.
The Corner Brook woman is president of the Dog Legislation Council of Canada and has been involved in rescuing neglected and abused dogs for 20 years.
When it comes to dog aggression, O’Reilly said the solution is not always to have the dog euthanized. More emphasis needs to be placed on making people realize the onus is on the owner to ensure their dog is trained to behave properly and that even troublesome dogs can be taught their place in the human world.
“None of us were ever born responsible dog owners,” she said. “We all learn over time. Lord knows I have. If you have the desire, the ability and the time, get a dog. If not, don’t just get a dog to complete the picture of the perfect family with the yellow Lab.”
Anyone who really wants a dog, she added, should be more than willing to spend the couple of hundred dollars it takes to not only properly train the dog, but to also train the master in what it means to be a responsible dog owner.
“It’s not only about training a dog to sit, stay and come when called,” she said. “Going to a dog trainer will help you understand your dog better. It will teach you good practical dog-handling skills such as visual clues to things like when the dog is getting tired and the kids are bothering it. You will know when it’s time to get the kids away from the dog or the dog away from the kids.”
Majority of bites unreported
While incidents of large dogs attacking children tend to grab the headlines, O’Reilly said the vast majority of dog bites go unreported and can involve any type of dog. Most, she noted, involve children left unsupervised with dogs and happen on the dog owner’s own property.
A recent article in The Western Star, in response to a recent vicious dog attack on a nine-year-old girl, quoted the Bay of Islands SPCA as saying the main reasons for dog aggression are a lack of socialization of the animal, particularly those left tethered and alone for lengthy periods of time, and the failure of their owners to have their pets spayed or neutered.
O’Reilly said these are valid concerns, but there are many other reasons a dog can exhibit aggressive behaviour, including combinations of those based on dominance, pain, fear, food, play, territory, the presence of other dogs or maternal instinct.
The focus has to remain on how the owner is equipped to handle the dog and how the dog has been trained to interact with people and other animals.
More severe fines
O’Reilly supports more severe fines related to irresponsible dog ownership and even banning such owners from owning another pet until they have proven they have a better appreciation for their responsibility to both the animal and to society at large. In addition to fines for violations of municipal or provincial laws, she believes amendments should be made so owners cannot simply abandon their dogs when they cause problems.
“Right now, negligent owners are walking way from fines (for roaming dogs) because they relinquish the dog and that’s the end of the story,” said O’Reilly. “Nothing is in place to stop them from getting another dog. I had one gentleman tie his dog to the end of my van and say he didn’t want it because it was too much trouble and he could just go get another one at the SPCA anyway, so why should he train this thing.”
In some jurisdictions, dog owners must incur the cost to have their animals put down and O’Reilly can’t see why the same should not be done in Corner Brook.
Every year, the City of Corner Brook bemoans the fact so few dog owners pay the fee to have their dogs licensed. O’Reilly thinks that might change if residents thought they were getting more value for their money.
She suggested a system involving a one-time fee and the use of microchips which can more easily identify the dog and its owner’s information as a start. In addition, the City should institute dog bite safety and responsible dog ownership programs, she said.
While acknowledging the SPCA has a very difficult, but important, job, O’Reilly said either that organization or the City should also have a sponsored program whereby low-income families can get their pets spayed or neutered.
As for the idea of mandatory spaying or neutering, unless the owner is a certified breeder, O’Reilly said that approach must target puppy mills and other questionable breeders. The breeding of purebred dogs, she noted, is already subject to federal legislation under the Animal Pedigree Act.
|
12/08/09
|
Comments: |
|
This Conversation is Semi-Moderated. What is moderation?
|
| What does moderation mean? |
 |
The Western Star is committed to encouraging intelligent discourse among our readers and to creating a forum where diverse views and opinions on a wide range of topics can be aired. The forum you are in now is a result of our continuing efforts to facilitate a dynamic online conversation among our readers.
This is a semi-moderated or reactively moderated conversation. Once a reader follows the steps to register and submit his or her comment it goes directly to the website. A comment may be edited or deleted for reasons of content or language.
All readers wishing to join a conversation must first sign in and agree to the Terms of Usage, which explain the rules of acceptable content.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
David from NL writes: Rottweilers (like LeeAnn's), Pit Bulls, Bull Mastiffs, German Shepherds, Dobermans.
Congratulations! You've just earned your diploma in Dogs That Attack.
|
| Posted 12/08/2009 at 9:39 AM | Alert an Editor | Link to comment |
| ALERT US ABOUT THIS COMMENT |
 |
Please let us know if this reader's comment breaks the rules explained in the Terms of Usage and is obscene, abusive, threatening, unlawful, harassing, defamatory, profane or racially offensive by selecting the appropriate option to describe the problem.
Do not use this to complain about comments that don't break the rules, for example those comments that you disagree with or contain spelling errors or multiple postings.
|
|
|
|
Jana from St.Johns, nl writes: Dave from NL, you must be a very unhappy person...you are so negative about everything!! Just because a dog is big does not mean that it will attack? Any size dog can bite. A dogs behaviour is the result of the envirornment it is being raised in...like children they learn by example. Some big dogs can look intimidating but can be as gentle as anything while a tiny lap dog can bite the ankles off of you. To make a statement such as Dave from Nl did just goes to speak to the ignorance of people regarding dogs...big in size can equate big heart not dog bites! And Dave...stop being so negative about EVERYTHING! Go get a dog and put some joy in your life!
|
| Posted 12/08/2009 at 10:10 AM | Alert an Editor | Link to comment |
| ALERT US ABOUT THIS COMMENT |
 |
Please let us know if this reader's comment breaks the rules explained in the Terms of Usage and is obscene, abusive, threatening, unlawful, harassing, defamatory, profane or racially offensive by selecting the appropriate option to describe the problem.
Do not use this to complain about comments that don't break the rules, for example those comments that you disagree with or contain spelling errors or multiple postings.
|
|
|
David from NL writes: Jana: Which ones always attack? Look it up, or is that negative?
And it's David, thank you.
|
| Posted 12/08/2009 at 10:15 AM | Alert an Editor | Link to comment |
| ALERT US ABOUT THIS COMMENT |
 |
Please let us know if this reader's comment breaks the rules explained in the Terms of Usage and is obscene, abusive, threatening, unlawful, harassing, defamatory, profane or racially offensive by selecting the appropriate option to describe the problem.
Do not use this to complain about comments that don't break the rules, for example those comments that you disagree with or contain spelling errors or multiple postings.
|
|
|
|
Random Newf from around from Newfoundland writes: I have had several dogs since my childhood and currently own a Boxer. I had a Rottweiler when I was a teenager, my parents taught me right from wrong with the dog and I tell ya he was close on 100lbs, stood about 2 and a half feet on all fours just a brute. But one thing about him I could take one of his treats put it in my lips and he would take it out and you would hardly even know it. DAVID from nl your statement is unfair as most of them are. Dogs if trained to attack will, even tamer dogs will on times attack, but there is always a reason, no training, lack of obedience but to stereotype all breeds as you did above was unfair. My two year old son hugs our boxer, climbs on his back, tugs on his slag skin, and never once have the dog offered to bite, or even snarl at our son, when he had enough he simply shoves our son with his nose and sneezes and goes to lay down where our son can't reach him. Not all dogs are alike, same goes for us humans, and by Davids statements he often makes that is a good thing!
|
| Posted 12/08/2009 at 11:10 AM | Alert an Editor | Link to comment |
| ALERT US ABOUT THIS COMMENT |
 |
Please let us know if this reader's comment breaks the rules explained in the Terms of Usage and is obscene, abusive, threatening, unlawful, harassing, defamatory, profane or racially offensive by selecting the appropriate option to describe the problem.
Do not use this to complain about comments that don't break the rules, for example those comments that you disagree with or contain spelling errors or multiple postings.
|
|
|
Reader from NL writes: David from NL, your posts are terrible. Your opinions stink. Time to get a life.
And it's David, thank you. ?????
Terrible.
|
| Posted 12/08/2009 at 11:38 AM | Alert an Editor | Link to comment |
| ALERT US ABOUT THIS COMMENT |
 |
Please let us know if this reader's comment breaks the rules explained in the Terms of Usage and is obscene, abusive, threatening, unlawful, harassing, defamatory, profane or racially offensive by selecting the appropriate option to describe the problem.
Do not use this to complain about comments that don't break the rules, for example those comments that you disagree with or contain spelling errors or multiple postings.
|
|
|
me2u from NL writes: Now, now children, behave or you are going to be grounded.
DAVID, I have owned two Dobs at the same time, and lived in a subdivision in Ontario. Not one problem with either one of them. Here are the facts, it isn't the breed that's the problem, it's the owners. Cesar Milan has proven that time and time again with his Pitbulls.
Small dogs and cats can be vicious but I do agree, the larger the dog, the more damage can happen. Which leads into the main point of the argument; know your breed and treat your animal accordingly. Stop tying dogs outside as it is a sure fired way of making them saucy and a potential time bomb.
|
| Posted 12/08/2009 at 11:57 AM | Alert an Editor | Link to comment |
| ALERT US ABOUT THIS COMMENT |
 |
Please let us know if this reader's comment breaks the rules explained in the Terms of Usage and is obscene, abusive, threatening, unlawful, harassing, defamatory, profane or racially offensive by selecting the appropriate option to describe the problem.
Do not use this to complain about comments that don't break the rules, for example those comments that you disagree with or contain spelling errors or multiple postings.
|
|
|
Expat in from BC writes: Please ignore posts from this David moron. He's just an angry little troll trying to get a rise out of everyone. It's what online trolls do. Just ignore him and he'll go away.
Good work Lee Ann.
|
| Posted 12/08/2009 at 12:19 PM | Alert an Editor | Link to comment |
| ALERT US ABOUT THIS COMMENT |
 |
Please let us know if this reader's comment breaks the rules explained in the Terms of Usage and is obscene, abusive, threatening, unlawful, harassing, defamatory, profane or racially offensive by selecting the appropriate option to describe the problem.
Do not use this to complain about comments that don't break the rules, for example those comments that you disagree with or contain spelling errors or multiple postings.
|
|
|
Nonsequitor from nl writes: Maybe the law should consider putting down the idiotic owners who let dogs bark and howl constantly while allowing these animals to deposit excrement and pi$$ burn other folks lawns with nothing other than their own self interests at heart.
It's not the animal(s) that have a problem, it's the ignorant self-serving owners that have problems.
Wake up people, there are other people with rights living all around you...
|
| Posted 12/08/2009 at 12:38 PM | Alert an Editor | Link to comment |
| ALERT US ABOUT THIS COMMENT |
 |
Please let us know if this reader's comment breaks the rules explained in the Terms of Usage and is obscene, abusive, threatening, unlawful, harassing, defamatory, profane or racially offensive by selecting the appropriate option to describe the problem.
Do not use this to complain about comments that don't break the rules, for example those comments that you disagree with or contain spelling errors or multiple postings.
|
|
|
|
Bob from Nl writes: David is a firm believer in the quantity of comments, not the quality of the comment. He's proof that fools are seldom recognized until they speak or write.
|
| Posted 12/08/2009 at 12:59 PM | Alert an Editor | Link to comment |
| ALERT US ABOUT THIS COMMENT |
 |
Please let us know if this reader's comment breaks the rules explained in the Terms of Usage and is obscene, abusive, threatening, unlawful, harassing, defamatory, profane or racially offensive by selecting the appropriate option to describe the problem.
Do not use this to complain about comments that don't break the rules, for example those comments that you disagree with or contain spelling errors or multiple postings.
|
|
|
|
been there from Corner Brook, Nfld writes: well ive been bitten by 2 dogs in my life and they were both small dogs.So there you go,it has nothing to do with the size or the breed.Its the individual dog.Any dog can bite a person but its only in the paper or on the news when its a big dog,never a small dog.
|
| Posted 12/08/2009 at 2:35 PM | Alert an Editor | Link to comment |
| ALERT US ABOUT THIS COMMENT |
 |
Please let us know if this reader's comment breaks the rules explained in the Terms of Usage and is obscene, abusive, threatening, unlawful, harassing, defamatory, profane or racially offensive by selecting the appropriate option to describe the problem.
Do not use this to complain about comments that don't break the rules, for example those comments that you disagree with or contain spelling errors or multiple postings.
|
|
|
|
Paul from Corner Brook, NL writes: Judging by past comments, the only thing that exceeds david's ignorance is his habit of writing about it in comments to the star.
|
| Posted 12/08/2009 at 4:04 PM | Alert an Editor | Link to comment |
| ALERT US ABOUT THIS COMMENT |
 |
Please let us know if this reader's comment breaks the rules explained in the Terms of Usage and is obscene, abusive, threatening, unlawful, harassing, defamatory, profane or racially offensive by selecting the appropriate option to describe the problem.
Do not use this to complain about comments that don't break the rules, for example those comments that you disagree with or contain spelling errors or multiple postings.
|
|
|
David from NL writes: No facts, just cowardly hatemail. Thoise 5 breeds account for most attcks. Look at the data and get your heads out of your #$%*.
Easier to attack the meesenger I guess. I see where these dogs get exposed to lots of anger and hostility----their owners!
|
| Posted 12/08/2009 at 4:10 PM | Alert an Editor | Link to comment |
| ALERT US ABOUT THIS COMMENT |
 |
Please let us know if this reader's comment breaks the rules explained in the Terms of Usage and is obscene, abusive, threatening, unlawful, harassing, defamatory, profane or racially offensive by selecting the appropriate option to describe the problem.
Do not use this to complain about comments that don't break the rules, for example those comments that you disagree with or contain spelling errors or multiple postings.
|
|
|
allie from N.B. writes: DAVE from NL
Is this all you do... Just try to find fault about everyone else... What about yourself....Get a live man...
And I can call you DAVE if I wish...
|
| Posted 12/08/2009 at 10:04 PM | Alert an Editor | Link to comment |
| ALERT US ABOUT THIS COMMENT |
 |
Please let us know if this reader's comment breaks the rules explained in the Terms of Usage and is obscene, abusive, threatening, unlawful, harassing, defamatory, profane or racially offensive by selecting the appropriate option to describe the problem.
Do not use this to complain about comments that don't break the rules, for example those comments that you disagree with or contain spelling errors or multiple postings.
|
|
|
|
Jane Holtved from Miramichi, N.B writes: Truer words were never spoken.Owners should be responsible for their dogs.I have owned Rotties and Cavaliers,all members of my family.I expected both large and small to be well behaved and both breeds were Certified St.John Therapy dogs.......In fact my Rottie worked at a womens'shelter and was loved by all.Education is the key for all owners of all breeds...
|
| Posted 12/08/2009 at 10:48 PM | Alert an Editor | Link to comment |
| ALERT US ABOUT THIS COMMENT |
 |
Please let us know if this reader's comment breaks the rules explained in the Terms of Usage and is obscene, abusive, threatening, unlawful, harassing, defamatory, profane or racially offensive by selecting the appropriate option to describe the problem.
Do not use this to complain about comments that don't break the rules, for example those comments that you disagree with or contain spelling errors or multiple postings.
|
|
|
|
John Kincaid from Peterborough, Ontario writes: I would like to suggest that the DLCC(Dog Legislation Council of Canada be asked to work withe the city to establish laws dealing with irresponsible owners.
|
| Posted 12/08/2009 at 10:55 PM | Alert an Editor | Link to comment |
| ALERT US ABOUT THIS COMMENT |
 |
Please let us know if this reader's comment breaks the rules explained in the Terms of Usage and is obscene, abusive, threatening, unlawful, harassing, defamatory, profane or racially offensive by selecting the appropriate option to describe the problem.
Do not use this to complain about comments that don't break the rules, for example those comments that you disagree with or contain spelling errors or multiple postings.
|
|
|
Carolyn Forbes from Burlington, Ontario writes: I support LeAnne O'Reilly in her statements in this article. Any dog can cause harm, and all dog owners need to be knowledgeable and to train their dogs. And its never the dog, its the owner.
Individuals should have to be tested and screened before they could own a dog.
If a dog bites, its the owner's responsibility. Put the responsibility where it belongs.To own a dog individuals should be required to complete a course in dog owner's responsibilities and be licensed to own a dog. Dogs only do or don't do what their owners have taught them. Dr. Michael Coran of UBC a specialist in dog behaviour states that the average psychological age of a dog is two years old, in terms of their knowledge, etc. So when do we blame a two year old? Its the owners, its the owners. Say it 100 times.
|
| Posted 12/08/2009 at 11:11 PM | Alert an Editor | Link to comment |
| ALERT US ABOUT THIS COMMENT |
 |
Please let us know if this reader's comment breaks the rules explained in the Terms of Usage and is obscene, abusive, threatening, unlawful, harassing, defamatory, profane or racially offensive by selecting the appropriate option to describe the problem.
Do not use this to complain about comments that don't break the rules, for example those comments that you disagree with or contain spelling errors or multiple postings.
|
|
|
Fran C from Toronto, On writes: Let's pay attention to situations that have or are being proven to actually WORK.
Calgary is the most successful city in North America when it comes to licensing, has NO BSL and their dog attacks are down, in spite of their huge growth, by 25% and no BSL. They make it easy for dog owners to license, spay and neuter YET hold OWNERS accountable for for actions of their dogs.
The Netherlands had a 25 year ban on certain dogs but after documenting, for DECADES, no difference in dog attacks, bites or fatalities, THEY now look to OWNER responsibility, accountability, strong leash laws and lastly but just as importantly, child and parent education.
It is time for wisdom and intelligence not the promotion of fear based on size or looks.
Good article, I hope that something wise comes of it.
BTW. Because men are bigger and stronger than woman and can do more damage when they hit and/or beat woman/children, I wonder is Davie boy things they ALL should be banned? LOL.
|
| Posted 13/08/2009 at 2:43 AM | Alert an Editor | Link to comment |
| ALERT US ABOUT THIS COMMENT |
 |
Please let us know if this reader's comment breaks the rules explained in the Terms of Usage and is obscene, abusive, threatening, unlawful, harassing, defamatory, profane or racially offensive by selecting the appropriate option to describe the problem.
Do not use this to complain about comments that don't break the rules, for example those comments that you disagree with or contain spelling errors or multiple postings.
|
|
|
LEE from Corner Brook, Nfld writes: It is absolutely unfortunate that not everyone is at that point were they are able to understand the research behind dog aggression.
In conversation with a world renowned researcher and author of several papers on dog aggression, (including the one 'David' took out of context) Dr Karen Overall , Center for Disease Control,stated for the record that the research did not support the banning of ANY BREED because the information used was obtained ONLY by two means, media reporting and a random telephone survey.
This informal survey asked vague questions like were you ever bitten by a dog , if so what color or breed was it? .
How many people know what breed a dog is by its looks? Even CKC Breed judges go through years of training and handling for each breed of dog they wish to judge.And not one of those CKC judges would EVER identify a breed by its' look alone.
How many of us have been severely bitten by a dog yet the incident was never reported in the media?How many times has the media been wrong in its reporting?
These two sources of information are hardly scientific or credible.They should never be used to condemn dogs to death merely because of what they 'look' like.
The CDC agrees to that, but David thinks otherwise.
It is more than clear through serious scientific literature that the breed is irrelevant.Especially since the vast majority of these bites are done by dogs of mixed breeds.Not all black dogs are Labradors, not all reddish dogs are Irish Setters.
Aggression in dogs spans the entire species, it can occur at any time under any circumstance.When owners forget that simple fact, that is when a bite can happen.
Relying on statistics not only leads to an inaccurate picture of what breeds are involved in fatalities and bite incidents in Canada,it also promotes a false sense of security to parents and dog owners alike to think their breed is safe .
Most, if not all, breeds have in their closet some pretty gruesome horror stories which does not speak well of the breed.In fact there is not one breed that hasn't been involved in at least one human fatality.
The Canadian Safety Council as well as CHIRPP (Canadian Hospitals Injury Reporting and Prevention Program) also gathers some data, but the data is limited to only what is reported by hospital emergency departments or yet again, by the media.
According to the present statistics, .01% of any breed is involved in attacks on humans, which means that 99.99% of that same breed would be penalized because of that .01%.
Dogs that have killed in Canada were almost exclusively unneutered males and a significant number of the attacks happened in packs of loose roaming dogs.
61 dogs from 12 different breeds/types were involved in the 24 attacks.
Fatal Dog Attacks, by Karen Delise (published by Anubis, 2002)is a study of all of the fatal dog attacks in the U.S. between 1965 and 2001.
Total number of victims is 431, total of 37 breeds/types of dogs have killed a person in the States. Included in the list of breeds/types which have killed are Westie, the Irish Setter, the Sainte Bernard, Newfoundland, the Brittany Spaniel, the Airedale and even a Pomeranian. Each of these have killed once. The cute Daschund -yes, the weiner dog - has killed three times.
Unprovoked dog biting incidents typically involve:
1. Unsupervised dogs of any breed.
2. unsocialized dogs.
3. known history of aggression.
4. An unsupervised child victim who knows the dog(s).
5. unsterilized dogs.
recommendations:
dog owner education,
parent and child education,
strict enforcement of existing leash and licensing laws,
a province-wide dog bite registry,
a province-wide bite prevention program,
stricter laws regulating breeders of unregistered ( those not registered with the Canadian Kennel Club ) and trainers.
By targeting often-maligned breeds and types, one promotes a false sense of security to the public.No one will ever be able to identify a dangerous dog by its 'looks' nor a dangerous owner by what breed/type of dog they happen to own.
An irresponsible owner will always claim ignorance or be ignorant of his or her dog's character. Regardless of breed, a responsible dog owner knows his or her dog's character and its flaws. Regardless of breed, a responsible dog owner does not allow his or her dog to run loose on the streets. Regardless of breed, a responsible dog owner is aware of his or her dog's propensity for biting behavior and takes appropriate steps to ensure that a bite never happens.
|
| Posted 13/08/2009 at 2:43 AM | Alert an Editor | Link to comment |
| ALERT US ABOUT THIS COMMENT |
 |
Please let us know if this reader's comment breaks the rules explained in the Terms of Usage and is obscene, abusive, threatening, unlawful, harassing, defamatory, profane or racially offensive by selecting the appropriate option to describe the problem.
Do not use this to complain about comments that don't break the rules, for example those comments that you disagree with or contain spelling errors or multiple postings.
|
|
|
|
David from NL writes: Denial is a river in Egypt.
|
| Posted 13/08/2009 at 8:31 AM | Alert an Editor | Link to comment |
| ALERT US ABOUT THIS COMMENT |
 |
Please let us know if this reader's comment breaks the rules explained in the Terms of Usage and is obscene, abusive, threatening, unlawful, harassing, defamatory, profane or racially offensive by selecting the appropriate option to describe the problem.
Do not use this to complain about comments that don't break the rules, for example those comments that you disagree with or contain spelling errors or multiple postings.
|
|
|
|
Elaine from Corner Brook, NL writes: Yes Lee, it is absolutely unfortunate that not everyone is at that point were they are able to understand the research behind dog aggression. What is more unfortunate is that these people would offer an opinion on these matters given this limited understanding. Please continue commenting on animal issues such as this. It may enlighten some of these people. God knows, they need all the elightenment they can get.
|
| Posted 13/08/2009 at 9:59 AM | Alert an Editor | Link to comment |
| ALERT US ABOUT THIS COMMENT |
 |
Please let us know if this reader's comment breaks the rules explained in the Terms of Usage and is obscene, abusive, threatening, unlawful, harassing, defamatory, profane or racially offensive by selecting the appropriate option to describe the problem.
Do not use this to complain about comments that don't break the rules, for example those comments that you disagree with or contain spelling errors or multiple postings.
|
|
|
|
Jayne Groves from On writes: Excellent article, lots of good information supplied.
|
| Posted 13/08/2009 at 11:46 AM | Alert an Editor | Link to comment |
| ALERT US ABOUT THIS COMMENT |
 |
Please let us know if this reader's comment breaks the rules explained in the Terms of Usage and is obscene, abusive, threatening, unlawful, harassing, defamatory, profane or racially offensive by selecting the appropriate option to describe the problem.
Do not use this to complain about comments that don't break the rules, for example those comments that you disagree with or contain spelling errors or multiple postings.
|
|
|
wildheart from earth writes: David from NL writes: Rottweilers (like LeeAnn's), Pit Bulls, Bull Mastiffs, German Shepherds, Dobermans.
Congratulations! You've just earned your diploma in Dogs That Attack.
David, you cannot presume that all dogs will attack, it is down to how they are trained & socialised. dogs are not born vicious, it is how HUMANS bring them up. Can i ask just because you are a man does this mean you could be a rapist?
|
| Posted 13/08/2009 at 12:59 PM | Alert an Editor | Link to comment |
| ALERT US ABOUT THIS COMMENT |
 |
Please let us know if this reader's comment breaks the rules explained in the Terms of Usage and is obscene, abusive, threatening, unlawful, harassing, defamatory, profane or racially offensive by selecting the appropriate option to describe the problem.
Do not use this to complain about comments that don't break the rules, for example those comments that you disagree with or contain spelling errors or multiple postings.
|
|
|
|
Erin from Newfoundland writes: I think the city should take in consideration that they are not experts in the field of animal behavior and there are groups out there such as the DLCC who have experience working with communities to implement effective legislation. Why not give it a shot, it could put Corner Brook on the map for being progressive and also keep those voters happy ( after all a huge portion of the population have dogs & cats !)...
|
| Posted 13/08/2009 at 2:30 PM | Alert an Editor | Link to comment |
| ALERT US ABOUT THIS COMMENT |
 |
Please let us know if this reader's comment breaks the rules explained in the Terms of Usage and is obscene, abusive, threatening, unlawful, harassing, defamatory, profane or racially offensive by selecting the appropriate option to describe the problem.
Do not use this to complain about comments that don't break the rules, for example those comments that you disagree with or contain spelling errors or multiple postings.
|
|
|
Peter E. Pibble from Ontario writes: Oh please David from NL
Let me introduce you to the fatal dog attacks in Canada
http://nationalcanineresearchcouncil.com/dog-bites/dog-bites-worldwide/
and what works and doesn`t work to reduce dog bites.
The Best Animal Control Program in North America is in
Calgary Alberta Canada
http://saveourdogs.net/category/successes/
|
| Posted 13/08/2009 at 4:09 PM | Alert an Editor | Link to comment |
| ALERT US ABOUT THIS COMMENT |
 |
Please let us know if this reader's comment breaks the rules explained in the Terms of Usage and is obscene, abusive, threatening, unlawful, harassing, defamatory, profane or racially offensive by selecting the appropriate option to describe the problem.
Do not use this to complain about comments that don't break the rules, for example those comments that you disagree with or contain spelling errors or multiple postings.
|
|
|
Sharon from St Johns, NL writes: I don't think that David can comprehend the responsibilties involved in owning a dog. Rather than attribute a dog's behaviour to it's owner, he falsely attributes the behaviour to the breed. This line of reasoning discredits the notion that the owner has an influence on a dog's behaviour, and thereby relieves the owner of any responsibility for the animal,s actions. He, like a lot of people, would rather blame the breed than the owner.
He also fails to understand that the dogs of choice for many irresponsible owners, who wish to have an agressive pet, most often are one of the larger breeds. Common sense should tell him that the people who would want to train an animal to be agressive, would not likely select a smaller animal for this purpose. This fact often leads people like David to assume the larger dogs are more agressive than a smaller one. Hopefully all this information will help educate people like David on what really influences a dog's behaviour.
|
| Posted 13/08/2009 at 4:53 PM | Alert an Editor | Link to comment |
| ALERT US ABOUT THIS COMMENT |
 |
Please let us know if this reader's comment breaks the rules explained in the Terms of Usage and is obscene, abusive, threatening, unlawful, harassing, defamatory, profane or racially offensive by selecting the appropriate option to describe the problem.
Do not use this to complain about comments that don't break the rules, for example those comments that you disagree with or contain spelling errors or multiple postings.
|
|
|
Peter E. Pibble from Ontario writes: David from NL
If you`re actually interested in Education rather than reading headlines may I suggest that you read this book.
It`s free!
Pit Bull Placebo:The Media,Myths and Politics of Canine Aggression
http://nationalcanineresearchcouncil.com/ncrc-publications/
You don`t want to go down the same road as Ontario, trust me.
I don`t know when the last case of Rabies occurred in Canada but it`s only a matter of time that we have Rabies reappear because of Ontario`s law which targets dogs simply due to looks rather than behavior.
People aren`t licensing their dogs out of fear.
Many People aren`t taking their dogs born after Nov 2005 for Veterinary care out of fear.
That means they`re not getting basic shots which includes the Rabies vaccine.
They`re not getting their dogs neutered due to fear.
And if you think Ontario dog owners have no reason to fear,think again.
Owner charged after taking puppy in to be neutered.
http://www.mississauganews.com/news/article/27668--bowser-another-rambo-case
Owner charged after HIS dog was attacked by a German Shepherd.
http://toronto.ctv.ca/servlet/an/local/CTVNews/20090617/pitbull_oca_090617/20090617/?hub=TorontoNewHome
More and more people are hiding their mutts because of a VERY foolish law and if Ontario starts to have Rabies cases,how long do you think it will be before Newfoundland has Rabies cases?
|
| Posted 13/08/2009 at 5:56 PM | Alert an Editor | Link to comment |
| ALERT US ABOUT THIS COMMENT |
 |
Please let us know if this reader's comment breaks the rules explained in the Terms of Usage and is obscene, abusive, threatening, unlawful, harassing, defamatory, profane or racially offensive by selecting the appropriate option to describe the problem.
Do not use this to complain about comments that don't break the rules, for example those comments that you disagree with or contain spelling errors or multiple postings.
|
|
|
Star kiddy from Exeter, Europe writes: Davey from NL
I am sure that when you have managed to find the clip to take off your blinkers, you will be able to find your stone and crawl back under it - you are such a lumpenproletariat.
|
| Posted 14/08/2009 at 5:47 AM | Alert an Editor | Link to comment |
| ALERT US ABOUT THIS COMMENT |
 |
Please let us know if this reader's comment breaks the rules explained in the Terms of Usage and is obscene, abusive, threatening, unlawful, harassing, defamatory, profane or racially offensive by selecting the appropriate option to describe the problem.
Do not use this to complain about comments that don't break the rules, for example those comments that you disagree with or contain spelling errors or multiple postings.
|
|
|
Lillian W from Erin, Ontario writes: This should be a dangerous owner by law, with the owners banned for life from owning a dog, and the dog re-homed to a dog savvy environment.
It is a shame that people are allowed to own dogs or have children or get married without a mandatory instructional course first.
|
| Posted 14/08/2009 at 8:59 AM | Alert an Editor | Link to comment |
| ALERT US ABOUT THIS COMMENT |
 |
Please let us know if this reader's comment breaks the rules explained in the Terms of Usage and is obscene, abusive, threatening, unlawful, harassing, defamatory, profane or racially offensive by selecting the appropriate option to describe the problem.
Do not use this to complain about comments that don't break the rules, for example those comments that you disagree with or contain spelling errors or multiple postings.
|
|
|
|
liz from united kingdom writes: Dopey ooops davey sweetheart......get a life!!! your a sad sad boy.
|
| Posted 14/08/2009 at 1:38 PM | Alert an Editor | Link to comment |
| ALERT US ABOUT THIS COMMENT |
 |
Please let us know if this reader's comment breaks the rules explained in the Terms of Usage and is obscene, abusive, threatening, unlawful, harassing, defamatory, profane or racially offensive by selecting the appropriate option to describe the problem.
Do not use this to complain about comments that don't break the rules, for example those comments that you disagree with or contain spelling errors or multiple postings.
|
|
|
Joy Day from Camberley, Europe writes: David, I am afraid it is comments such as yours that show up your ignorance on the breeds you mention. It also tells people like myself that owns one of those breeds and has done for 20 yrs, including working with 100's through training and rescue that you probably have never even either met one or been involved with one.
It is a fact that the horse kills more humans than dogs do. It is also a fact that other dog breeds cause horrendous damage but never make the headlines.
At least get your facts correct before showing yourself up with ignorant statements.
|
| Posted 15/08/2009 at 6:23 AM | Alert an Editor | Link to comment |
| ALERT US ABOUT THIS COMMENT |
 |
Please let us know if this reader's comment breaks the rules explained in the Terms of Usage and is obscene, abusive, threatening, unlawful, harassing, defamatory, profane or racially offensive by selecting the appropriate option to describe the problem.
Do not use this to complain about comments that don't break the rules, for example those comments that you disagree with or contain spelling errors or multiple postings.
|
|
|
NOTE
The management of this site emphasizes that it is in no way liable for persons, physical or legal, who are hosted here. Moreover, the managers of this site may not be held liable for errors and omissions that may slip into the information displayed in these reader comments. Everyone who submits a comment should read, understand and agree to the Terms of Usage for this section.
 |
|
|
|
|
|