 |

 |
OBITUARIES - DEATH NOTICES - CARDS OF THANKS
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|




 |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
| Last updated at 1:53 AM on 04/11/09 |
Illegible disclosure information delays court case 
CORNER BROOK CORY HURLEY The Western Star
Brian Perry’s complaints about illegible disclosure information has delayed his criminal matter.
The 53-year-old man is facing seven charges, four counts of making harassing phone calls, one of making indecent phone calls and two breaches of probation.
He appeared in provincial court in Corner Brook Tuesday, after being granted time to review the file against him and determine how he would proceed. However, because he was unable to read the police officers notes within those documents, he requested a revised copy. That is currently being done and is expected to take up to another week.
When Judge Wayne Gorman asked Perry if he was free to return Nov. 17, he said no. He said he also wasn’t available the following week. When the judge asked him when he was available, Perry said in one year. That being too long of a postponement, he told the judge six months would be good. Again, too lengthy of a postponement for the judge’s liking. Eventually, he said he had no choice but to return Nov. 17.
Perry is waiting to review the disclosure to determine whether he will seek legal representation. He voiced his displeasure with continuing to come back to court to deal with this.
The phone calls in question were placed to the local offices of the three MHAs representing Corner Brook and the Bay of Islands — Premier Danny Williams, Finance Minister Tom Marshall, and Terry Loder. Office staff and the politicians are mentioned in the court information.
Perry has been contesting what he feels are injustices done to him in the 1990s for years. He claims he ceased operation of the Village Lounge in Meadows on the north shore of the Bay of Islands due to lost sales because community halls were operating without proper liquor licences.
During a court appearance in October, Perry denied Crown attorney Trina Bussey’s attempt to withdraw two of the charges against him. He said he wanted them called in court so he could find out why they were laid.
|
04/11/09
|
Comments: |
|
This Conversation is Semi-Moderated. What is moderation?
|
| What does moderation mean? |
 |
The Western Star is committed to encouraging intelligent discourse among our readers and to creating a forum where diverse views and opinions on a wide range of topics can be aired. The forum you are in now is a result of our continuing efforts to facilitate a dynamic online conversation among our readers.
This is a semi-moderated or reactively moderated conversation. Once a reader follows the steps to register and submit his or her comment it goes directly to the website. A comment may be edited or deleted for reasons of content or language.
All readers wishing to join a conversation must first sign in and agree to the Terms of Usage, which explain the rules of acceptable content.
|
|
|
(Post a comment)
|
 |
 |
 |
|
Bobby from NL writes: Id worry about the other 5 charges and wouldnt lose any sleep over two being dropped. They attempted to drop them as there were probably less than reasonable grounds to believe the incident took place according to law
|
| Posted 04/11/2009 at 8:31 AM | Alert an Editor | Link to comment |
| ALERT US ABOUT THIS COMMENT |
 |
Please let us know if this reader's comment breaks the rules explained in the Terms of Usage and is obscene, abusive, threatening, unlawful, harassing, defamatory, profane or racially offensive by selecting the appropriate option to describe the problem.
Do not use this to complain about comments that don't break the rules, for example those comments that you disagree with or contain spelling errors or multiple postings.
|
|
|
|
Kevin Power from Waterloo, Ontario writes: Sounds like a real nuisance to me. What a waste of time and resources.
|
| Posted 04/11/2009 at 11:35 AM | Alert an Editor | Link to comment |
| ALERT US ABOUT THIS COMMENT |
 |
Please let us know if this reader's comment breaks the rules explained in the Terms of Usage and is obscene, abusive, threatening, unlawful, harassing, defamatory, profane or racially offensive by selecting the appropriate option to describe the problem.
Do not use this to complain about comments that don't break the rules, for example those comments that you disagree with or contain spelling errors or multiple postings.
|
|
|
|
former resident from ontario writes: nothing else better to do with your money down there throw it away to the judges and laywers perfect example of how the rich get richer and the poor stay poor
|
| Posted 04/11/2009 at 12:20 PM | Alert an Editor | Link to comment |
| ALERT US ABOUT THIS COMMENT |
 |
Please let us know if this reader's comment breaks the rules explained in the Terms of Usage and is obscene, abusive, threatening, unlawful, harassing, defamatory, profane or racially offensive by selecting the appropriate option to describe the problem.
Do not use this to complain about comments that don't break the rules, for example those comments that you disagree with or contain spelling errors or multiple postings.
|
|
|
NOTE
The management of this site emphasizes that it is in no way liable for persons, physical or legal, who are hosted here. Moreover, the managers of this site may not be held liable for errors and omissions that may slip into the information displayed in these reader comments. Everyone who submits a comment should read, understand and agree to the Terms of Usage for this section.
 |
|
|
|
|
|