Top News

Chickens ordered to be removed


None

Tatum Ryan holds one of her five hens in this file photo from June 2013.

STEPHENVILLE  Tatum Ryan is at a loss to understand why she has to remove chickens from her property at 5 Maple Street in Stephenville, when a man in Corner Brook was able to obtain a temporary permit to keep his backyard hens.

At a Stephenville town council meeting on Thursday, June 13, an order was issued to the owner of the property at 5 Maple Street, pursuant to provisions of Section 404 of the Municipalities Act 199, Chapter M-24 and Section 102 of the Urban and Rural Planning Act 2000, to remove the livestock (chickens) within 14 days of the date of delivery of the order.

Ryan said this order is mostly related to the enclosure she had built and it’s because she didn’t have a permit to build it.

“I didn’t think I would need a permit to build a pen as it does not have a closed-in roof or walls and is not weather-proofed by any means,” she said. “I’d like to take every opportunity to collaborate with the town to obtain the proper permits and/or develop an ordinance for allowing backyard chickens.”

A man in Corner Brook obtained a temporary permit to keep his backyard hens and was able to make a case promoting the benefits of backyard chickens as part of the city’s evolving sustainability plan.

Ryan said with a city the size of Corner Brook able to accommodate that man, she can’t understand why a town the size of Stephenville can’t accommodate her, especially since she has a double lot with a total of 1,921 square meters of land.

On the verge of extinction

Her backyard hens are actually heritage breeds, meaning they are rare and on the verge of extinction, including three Houdon’s, one Australorp and one Cochin. She said the fact hens have the capacity to lay eggs shouldn’t be the only determining factor in lumping them in a livestock category.

“The fact is we (the single mother and her three kids) have no rooster for breeding our hens, nor any interest in generating income from the eggs they lay,” she said. “Rather, we want to enjoy them (hens) as pets.”

Ryan said there is little odour from the hens and they make very little noise. She said her children took around a petition in the neighbourhood last year and it was signed by 60 people in support of the family keeping the hens.

“I am aware of only one neighbour who opposes the hens and I’m not sure of the reasons,” she said.

Ryan said backyard hens are allowed in London, Ont., Vancouver and Victoria, B.C. There is also a pilot project allowing backyard hens in Fredericton, N.B., along with the one in Corner Brook.

These are urban areas where she said there is a progressive movement to allow folks the opportunity to self-sustain their families with food, not only from their gardens, but from a small flock of laying hens or dual-purpose birds.

Ryan plans to appeal the decision of the Stephenville town council to the Western Regional Appeals Board.

Mayor Tom O’Brien said Ryan is certainly welcome to make her appeal, as that is part of the process. He said any decision of the town council could be appealed to the board.

He said this matter was dealt with last year, and the owner was told then the hens are considered to be livestock and not permitted in town.

In relation to the situation in Corner Brook, O’Brien said he can only speak for the town of Stephenville’s regulations and under those regulations it’s clear that livestock is not permitted to be kept in town and chickens clearly fall under the heading of livestock.

In regards to Ryan saying there is only person complaining about the hens, O’Brien said the town has received at least three complaints from the neighbourhood.

Recent Stories