• Print
  • Send to a friend
  • Comment (6)
  •  

Name change could signal end for autonomy: Kelly

Professor John Kelly, right, is seen with Premier Danny Williams in this undated photo. Submitted

Professor John Kelly, right, is seen with Premier Danny Williams in this undated photo.

Published on September 10, 2010
Published on September 10, 2010
Cliff Wells  RSS Feed

CORNER BROOK John Kelly, one of the architects of a report which recommended the province grant Sir Wilfred Grenfell College status as an autonomous university, is disappointed by its new name : Grenfell Campus, Memorial University of Newfoundland.

Topics :
Sir Wilfred Grenfell College , University College Dublin , Anglia Ruskin University , Corner Brook , China , Middle East

To him it is an example of the provincial government’s intention to not give the institution the degree of autonomy as recommended in the report he and John Davies, a professor at Anglia Ruskin University, submitted three years ago.

The report said the college should be granted full university status with its own senate, its own budget but share a board of regents with Memorial in St. John’s.

The province, which had originally accepted the recommendations, has stepped back from granting full status and a senate to the Corner Brook campus, even going so far as to challenge the institution to “earn it.”

Kelly, who is a professor at University College Dublin, believes the word campus in the moniker that amounts to the same thing as the old one. He said Grenfell Campus will be seen as much the same as Sir Wilfred Grenfell College.

“I don’t understand why Premier (Danny) Williams and his government didn’t grant the university senate to Grenfell College,” he said. “Even though they have their own budget ... the expenditure and setting of the budget is totally dependent on St. John’s. In fact, even with this title ‘Grenfell Campus,’ it’s still just a department of Memorial in St. John’s. I think this is difficult to understand.”

He believes Grenfell could be competitive if it was given the tools, and a name of its own is one of them.

In fact, even with this title ‘Grenfell Campus,’ it’s still just a department of Memorial in St. John’s. - Professor John Kelly

He’d hoped a new name would give Grenfell a chance to get better students nationally and internationally and go after the best faculty, but now it’s handicapped by being a satellite of St. John’s.

A prepared statement announcing the name change noted documented confusion among prospective students, faculty and other stakeholders about the nature of the campus’s offerings due to the use of the word college. It says this has resulted in difficulties in student and faculty recruitment, and in attraction of research and other funding reserved for universities.

 Kelly believes students from China or the Middle East will see the word campus in a similar fashion as they would college in this situation.

“The Marine Institute has a far higher degree of independence and status than Grenfell will with this title,” he said. “Across Canada in recent years premiers were upgrading colleges to university status in pretty substantial numbers. These colleges had not the status that Grenfell had and they’re now thriving. Look at Cape Breton University, that is thriving.

“It’s a hen and egg situation. The government and Premier Williams might be thinking ‘we can’t give university status to Grenfell until it improves its enrolment. It can’t improve its enrolment until it’s given university status.”

Comments

  • Username
    Andrew
    - September 12, 2010 at 19:41:36

    I totally agree with every word that John Kelly said. Personally, I would have really liked to see Grenfell named SIr Wilfred Grenfell University. However, I would like to ad that we are way too quickly to point fingers at Danny. I personally think he is our most effective premier to date - And nobody can be perfect.

    Submit a Comment

    • Username
      S
      - September 13, 2010 at 11:42:01

      Sure, Andrew. If it became SWG university, it would be all kudos to Danny. But now it's confirmed that SWG will only ever be a part (and a small and dependent part at that) of the larger MUN. Despite the very clear promise from Danny for academic and financial autonomy. I guess this is all outside Danny's ability to do anything? Yeah, very effective for sure.

  • Username
    Geoff Meeker
    - September 12, 2010 at 15:27:02

    The question is, what will residents of the area do now? The premier broke an election promise. Will the people roll over, or stand up and be heard?

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Concerned Student
    - September 11, 2010 at 16:37:37

    I believe what John Kelly says it true... The hopes for autonomy at Grenfell is dead... any died a long time ago. What was accepted by the current Grenfell administration is exactly what John Ashton turned down. We sure could use another voice like the one we had with John Ashton... he would never have let this happen.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    David
    - September 11, 2010 at 16:37:24

    Do none of you people get it yet? Despite everyone's absolute facination with politics around here, you're incredibly naive about how it works....which suits politicans just fine.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    S
    - September 11, 2010 at 16:29:28

    This name change does represent exactly that - the end of the road for the false promise of independence or "autonomy". Welcome to DannyGov: when you won't make a real change, just change the name. After all, if you can create the illusion of change then isn't that just good enough?

    Submit a Comment

Submit a Comment

Submit a Comment

This form is NOT used for emailing the article to a friend. Please use the "Send to a friend" link at the top of the page for that purpose.

The Western Star is not responsible for posted comments. Please be polite and confine your comments to the subject of the posted story. If you have an account, please sign on to it..

(we keep all emails private)
Agreement

We ask that users remain courteous. You may not post insulting, discriminatory or inappropriate content, which may be removed at our discretion. We are not responsible for user content and opinions. Use of this site as well as content submission & ownership are governed by our Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.

Member organizations should be non-profit in nature, and promote legal activities. Any organization found promoting illegal activities or commercial products or services will be deleted from the site.

I agree with these conditions.

Advertising




loading...

Advertising